Skip to content

OSSM-9336 Docs for understanding versioning, Service Mesh & Istio versions, and Operator Updates & Channels #91920

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

shreyasiddhartha
Copy link
Contributor

@shreyasiddhartha shreyasiddhartha commented Apr 9, 2025

Change type: Doc update; OSSM docs for understanding versioning, Service Mesh & Istio versions, and Operator Updates & Channels

Doc JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSSM-9336

Fix Version: service-mesh-docs-main and service-mesh-docs-3.0

NOTE TO THE SME and QE: This PR only covers the following sections from the docs: Understanding versioning, Understanding Service Mesh and Istio versions, Understanding Operator updates and channels, and About Operator update process. The next sections will be updated in the upcoming/separate PRs. The main story is: OSSM-8218

Doc Preview: https://91920--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-service-mesh/latest/update/ossm-updating-openshift-service-mesh#ossm-understanding-versioning_ossm-updating-openshift-service-mesh

SME Review/QE Review: @MaxBab @fjglira
Peer Review:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 9, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 11, 2025
@shreyasiddhartha
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label service-mesh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the service-mesh Label for all Service Mesh PRs label Apr 14, 2025
Copy link

@fjglira fjglira left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm in general, just to minor comments

@shreyasiddhartha shreyasiddhartha force-pushed the OSSM-9336 branch 2 times, most recently from 4056696 to 554ead8 Compare April 16, 2025 08:49
@shreyasiddhartha
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Apr 16, 2025
@tmalove
Copy link
Contributor

tmalove commented Apr 16, 2025

/remove-label peer-review-needed
/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 16, 2025
@tmalove
Copy link
Contributor

tmalove commented Apr 16, 2025

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/label peer-review-done

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Apr 16, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 17, 2025

@shreyasiddhartha: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@shreyasiddhartha
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Apr 17, 2025
@sheriff-rh sheriff-rh added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 17, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sheriff-rh sheriff-rh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, merging.

@sheriff-rh sheriff-rh merged commit 831a527 into openshift:service-mesh-docs-main Apr 17, 2025
2 checks passed
@sheriff-rh
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick service-mesh-docs-3.0

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@sheriff-rh: new pull request created: #92322

In response to this:

/cherrypick service-mesh-docs-3.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR service-mesh Label for all Service Mesh PRs size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants