Skip to content

Update log6x-oc-explain.adoc #93675

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: enterprise-4.17
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

amandverma
Copy link

@amandverma amandverma commented May 22, 2025

Changed type information for lokistacks.loki.grafana.com.spec.size from integer to string

lokistacks.loki.grafana.com.spec.size should be defined using an string value

Version(s):

4.17

Issue:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-1887

Link to docs preview:

https://93675--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/logging/logging-6.0/log6x-upgrading-to-6.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 22, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented May 22, 2025

@amandverma
Copy link
Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label May 22, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@jab-rh jab-rh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@amandverma, I've left a comment, thanks!

@jab-rh jab-rh added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels May 22, 2025
Changed type information for lokistacks.loki.grafana.com.spec.size from integer to string

Update modules/log6x-oc-explain.adoc

Co-Authored-By: Jason Βoxman <[email protected]>
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 22, 2025

@amandverma: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@amandverma
Copy link
Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label May 22, 2025
@skopacz1 skopacz1 added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label May 22, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@skopacz1 skopacz1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@skopacz1 skopacz1 removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels May 22, 2025
@amandverma
Copy link
Author

amandverma commented May 22, 2025

/label qe-review-needed

@anpingli
Copy link

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants