OCPBUGS-68019: update logrus to v1.9.1#321
OCPBUGS-68019: update logrus to v1.9.1#321openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.15from
Conversation
|
@dusk125: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-68019, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited based on label configuration. 🚫 Review skipped — only excluded labels are configured. (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
/retest-required |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
Did these 4.15 jobs rot? |
|
/lgtm |
|
/retest-required |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval. This pull-request has been approved by: dusk125, p0lyn0mial The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
ah, i didn't see this comment before kicking off retesting |
|
@dusk125: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@dusk125: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-68019, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@dusk125: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-68019, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@dusk125: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-68019, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/verified by ci |
|
@dusk125: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
57a122c
into
openshift:release-4.15
|
@dusk125: An error was encountered invalid pull identifier with 2 parts: "mjuanxd/logrus-dos-poc" for bug OCPBUGS-68019 on the Jira server at https://issues.redhat.com/. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details. Full error message.
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with Jira Issue OCPBUGS-68019 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
I chose to do the minimum upgrade to fix the issue -> v1.9.1, but it does seem like this could safely be bumped to v1.9.3 if that's preferred.