Skip to content

Comments

[18.0-fr5] Add missing resources for swiftStorage and swiftProxy pods#448

Open
openshift-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 1 commit intoopenstack-k8s-operators:18.0-fr5from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-447-to-18.0-fr5
Open

[18.0-fr5] Add missing resources for swiftStorage and swiftProxy pods#448
openshift-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 1 commit intoopenstack-k8s-operators:18.0-fr5from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-447-to-18.0-fr5

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #447

/assign cschwede

These pods are by default using the QoSc class "BestEffort". However,
these might be evicted if the system is under pressure, and the
"Burstable" QoS class might be required to ensure the *-server
containers are not killed.

Due to the number of containers only the API servers will use the
resource limits to prevent eviction while an API request is ongoing. The
*-server process are also using much more memory compared to other
background processes.

However, this limits the usable QoS classes to "BestEffort" (the
default) and "Burstable". "Guaranteed" could only be used if all
containers use limits, but this would either need much more fine-grained
limits or using much more than actual needed for the background
processes.

JIRA: OSPRH-21545
Signed-off-by: Christian Schwede <cschwede@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 23, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign stuggi for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@fmount
Copy link
Contributor

fmount commented Feb 23, 2026

/lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants