Skip to content

Integrating stackviz with test-operator#327

Closed
sauragar wants to merge 3 commits intoopenstack-k8s-operators:mainfrom
sauragar:OSPRH-12077
Closed

Integrating stackviz with test-operator#327
sauragar wants to merge 3 commits intoopenstack-k8s-operators:mainfrom
sauragar:OSPRH-12077

Conversation

@sauragar
Copy link

@sauragar sauragar commented Sep 8, 2025

Updated tempest.yaml to install stackviz and added a function to run_tempest.sh to generate stackviz report from the subunit file

Ticket: OSPRh-12077

Updated tempest.yaml to install stackviz and added a function to run_tempest.sh to generate stackviz report from the subunit file

Ticket: OSPRh-12077
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from olliewalsh and rabi September 8, 2025 16:40
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 8, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sauragar
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign seanmooney for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Integrates the modified stackviz from review 973914 with the following changes:
- Install stackviz from Gerrit refs/changes/14/973914/1
- Copy stackviz HTML app files to /var/lib/tempest/stackviz/ during container build
- Add decompression of .subunit.gz files before processing
- Remove non-existent stackviz-html command
- Update stackviz-export to output JSON to stackviz/data/ directory for HTML interface

This ensures tempest results are properly visualized in stackviz with the new export functionality.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/1b6789d362f24de691017b5c5a64fee2

tcib-openstack-meta-content-provider-master FAILURE in 25m 19s
⚠️ tcib-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal-master SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job tcib-openstack-meta-content-provider-master
⚠️ tcib-podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc-master SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job tcib-openstack-meta-content-provider-master

…ection

Move stackviz directory from /var/lib/tempest/stackviz/ to
/var/lib/tempest/external_files/stackviz/ so that it is properly
collected as a Zuul artifact.

Changes:
- Update container build to copy HTML files to external_files/stackviz/
- Update runtime script to generate JSON data in external_files/stackviz/data/
- Ensures stackviz results are accessible in Zuul job artifacts

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/58d26ecdebb9402695eef516cec521de

tcib-openstack-meta-content-provider-master FAILURE in 30m 45s
⚠️ tcib-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal-master SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job tcib-openstack-meta-content-provider-master
⚠️ tcib-podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc-master SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job tcib-openstack-meta-content-provider-master

@arxcruz
Copy link
Contributor

arxcruz commented Jan 22, 2026

We can't ship stackviz. Close this patch, we need to find a different approach for it.

@sauragar
Copy link
Author

As per discussion with @arxcruz we are not going with the changes in the tcib repo as per
Mike Burns instruction, @kstrenkova and I need to plan to integrate Stackviz via some other method.

@sauragar sauragar closed this Jan 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants