-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 166
enhanced subject line formatting options for email #2866
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Alex-Jordan
wants to merge
2
commits into
openwebwork:develop
Choose a base branch
from
Alex-Jordan:email-subject-format
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think that the recursive sub-pattern in this is right. I think it should be removed, and this should be
The problem with the recursive sub-pattern is that it matches balanced braces which means it will include matched braces inside a matched brace pair. At first you might think that is correct, but it really isn't. For example, consider the
$mail{feedbackSubectFormat}that contains[WWfeedback] course:%c user:%u{{ set:%s}}{ prob:%p}{ sec:%x}{ rec:%r}. With that subject format the recursive sub-pattern makes@bracescontain{{ set:%s}},{prob:%p},{sec:%x}, and{$rec:%r}. Then on line 406$regexis{{ set:%s}}|{ rec:%r}|{ prob:%p}|{ sec:%x}and that causes the warningUnescaped left brace in regex is passed through in regex.If you remove the recursive sub-pattern, then your current value for
$mail{feedbackSubjectFormat}still works, and so does the modified value I gave in the example above.In any case, there should never be any warnings regardless of what the
$mail{feedbackSubjectFormat}is set to since it is string that can be set by a user (the instructor of the course in this case).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another option if you really think the recursive sub-pattern is necessary is to change line 404 to
my $regex = join('|', map { $_ =~ s/([{}])/\\$1/gr } keys %braces);. I.e., escape the braces for the regex.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm. I am seeing other warnings in certain cases as well. If a brace pair contains some other character that needs to be escaped in a regular expression, then there are still warnings. For example, if the
$mail{feedbackSubjectFormat}contains something like{ [set:$s}. That is not very well formed, but could happen, and should not result in warnings.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So here is the best code that I have found so far. It keeps the sub-pattern recursion and I haven't been able to get warnings from anything so far.
The
evalprevents the warnings. Although, it also prevents the brace substitutions from happening if there is something that causes issues with creating the regular expression.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note I did see a reason to keep the recursive sub-pattern. If the subject template contains
{{ rec:%r}}and the recitation is not set, then that entire thing is removed from the end result with the recursive sub-pattern. However, the outer braces is kept without the recursive sub-pattern.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You could add brackets to the escaping substitution if you want to (so
my $regex = join('|', map { $_ =~ s/([{}[\]])/\\$1/gr } keys %braces);) if you want to make bad brackets work. However, theevalis still needed, because there are lots of other cases where something in the user defined$mai{feedbackSubjectFormat}will cause issues.