-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
[AQUA] Adding ADS support for embedding models in Multi Model Deployment #1163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4248b98
added support for embedding models in multi model
elizjo 11802a7
fixed unit tests for embedding multi model deployments
elizjo c1a0478
removed print statements and added clarifying docstring
elizjo 4e2bda0
Merge branch 'main' into ODSC-70052/embedding_multi_model
mrDzurb 7897b38
added validation logic for model_task and unit test in test_model.py
elizjo 987b60d
refactored _get_task
elizjo f37c6e0
removed comment and added case-insensitive match for model_task
elizjo e0bbc9b
updated comment on model_task pydantic parameter description
elizjo 46a6789
Merge branch 'main' into ODSC-70052/embedding_multi_model
elizjo 44c25b8
fixed type signature and changed method name
elizjo d6b66f1
updated error messages
elizjo c21d4cb
fixed diff for model.py
elizjo 2bb7a9f
added comment about revisiting logic
elizjo File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can show more informative error:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
since we removed the task level validation in the recent release, any reason to add the validation in the function `_extract_model_task again?
This is fine for now since we only have 1 verified embedding model, but if in the future if we start supporting (unverified) models, embedding models could have task value as feature_extraction or sentence_similarity. Might be good to add a comment here to reconsider this logic when we start supporting additional models.