Skip to content

Conversation

@turbocrime
Copy link
Collaborator

@turbocrime turbocrime commented Apr 9, 2025

custody service implementation focuses on validation. actual authorization logic is provided via context, so service host can be more flexible in implementation. is removed

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 9, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 5c96708

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
@penumbra-zone/services Major

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@TalDerei
Copy link
Contributor

custody service implementation focuses on validation. actual authorization logic is provided via context, so service host can be more flexible in implementation.

validation in service, logic in context is a good seperation of concerns here

@turbocrime turbocrime force-pushed the custody-service-context branch 8 times, most recently from 82b0848 to 16a68a5 Compare April 25, 2025 07:44
@turbocrime turbocrime marked this pull request as ready for review April 25, 2025 07:47
@turbocrime
Copy link
Collaborator Author

implemented more validation and extensive tests of validation. prepares custody service to support more varied implementations

@turbocrime turbocrime force-pushed the custody-service-context branch from 5f283a4 to f8f3b43 Compare April 28, 2025 03:41
@turbocrime turbocrime force-pushed the custody-service-context branch 3 times, most recently from 3996532 to 630852e Compare May 13, 2025 23:22
@turbocrime turbocrime changed the title configurable custody service rm custody service May 13, 2025
@turbocrime turbocrime force-pushed the custody-service-context branch from 630852e to 5c96708 Compare May 14, 2025 19:08
@TalDerei TalDerei self-requested a review May 16, 2025 04:31
Copy link
Contributor

@TalDerei TalDerei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

discussed offline; looks good to me and can land for the next prax release with the refactored custody.

@TalDerei
Copy link
Contributor

this is also good to land after the prax ledger changes merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants