Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BorringSSL Fork #2342

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: poco-1.10.0
Choose a base branch
from
Open

BorringSSL Fork #2342

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

AnDevi
Copy link

@AnDevi AnDevi commented May 21, 2018

Those are changes necessary to build Poco Library with BoringSSL instead of OpenSSL.
I tested that it's works on MacOs.

Copy link
Member

@aleks-f aleks-f left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1.9.0 has already been released, please send this pull to 1.9.1

case EVP_CIPH_CCM_MODE:
return MODE_CCM;
//Changed for port OpenSSL -> BoringSSL
#if defined(OPENSSL_IS_BORINGSSL)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why this?

throw NotImplementedException();
#else
std::string friendlyName;
f(pCert)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I doubt this will compile

#else

//Changed for port OpenSSL -> BoringSSL
#if defined(OPENSSL_IS_BORINGSSL)
dh->p = BN_bin2bn(dh1024_p, sizeof(dh1024_p), 0);
dh->g = BN_bin2bn(dh1024_g, sizeof(dh1024_g), 0);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no need to set dh->length here?

@obiltschnig
Copy link
Member

Please re-target pull request against poco-1.10.0 branch.

@AnDevi AnDevi changed the base branch from poco-1.9.0 to poco-1.10.0 October 23, 2019 08:37
@aleks-f aleks-f added this to the Unspecified milestone Jun 21, 2022
@aleks-f
Copy link
Member

aleks-f commented Dec 4, 2023

@matejk not urgent, put on TODO list

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants