Clarify that calculateBoundingBox is aligned to the axes.

[Invariance-NaN]

The current docs for calculateBoundingBox are not quite correct, since the "smallest rectangular prism" containing the geometry need not be aligned to the axes.

[ksen0]

Thanks for raising this @Invariance-NaN !

The reference is automatically built from the p5.js core source code. To change this part of the reference, this file should be changed: https://github.com/processing/p5.js/blob/db7747174b32ab1851547f0212e5b8e24d2064cb/src/webgl/p5.Geometry.js#L683 As suggested in the contributor guidelines, in the future / in general, please make an issue first, and explain your proposal there, before working on a solution - so that the solution can first be discussed.

I'll close this PR lease feel free to open an issue/PR in that repository!

In terms of the suggestion itself, I think pointing out that the outcome needs, e.g., translation (in the example translate(bbox.offset.x, bbox.offset.y, bbox.offset.z);) would be helpful, however I think the first line of the reference should remain as beginner-friendly as possible. To strike a balance, I'd suggest adding a 1 or 2 sentence paragraph, after "size (length) and offset (center).", that uses the axis-aligned bounding box terminology, and also explains it. I think it's important that if we use any technical terms, we also explain them in the reference, however I might be wrong in my understanding of the intent here, or maybe others have a better idea.

If you do make an issue/PR in the p5.js repository to make this suggestion, or an updated version, please feel free to tag me or @perminder-17 and one of us will be happy to review!