feat: implement AEW v2.1 SCC Cognitive Contract protocol - #77
Conversation
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request implements the Antifragile Epistemic Weaver (AEW) v2.1 SCC Protocol, introducing the AEWCognitiveContractSimulator class, ADR-22 documentation, README/CHANGELOG updates, and corresponding unit tests. The review feedback focuses on improving code quality and robustness within aew_cognitive_contract.py by removing an unused numpy import, enabling dependency injection for the agent in the simulator's constructor, and adding input validation for the simulation parameters to prevent runtime type errors.
Important
The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.
This PR implements the Antifragile Epistemic Weaver (AEW) v2.1 SCC Protocol, effectively serving as the "Paradox Metabolizer".
Key features:
PluriversalFeatureDiscoveryAgentto enact Chain-of-Code simulations. It validates paraconsistent hypotheses while enforcing rigid constraints: Topological Novelty (β1 > 0.7) and Structural Conservation (β0 > 0.9).docs/adr/22-aew-cognitive-contract.md.test_aew_cognitive_contract.pyvalidating the simulation routing and constraint rejection.README.mdandCHANGELOG.mdreflecting the new agent architecture and paradox metabolism methodologies.PR created automatically by Jules for task 1985707235551194241 started by @projectedanx