Skip to content

(CAT-2218): Add 'forms' to valid authentication schemas and update validation message #398

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

span786
Copy link
Contributor

@span786 span786 commented Mar 3, 2025

Summary

Add 'forms' to valid authentication schemas and update validation message

Additional Context

Currently the iis_site and iis_application resources in the puppetlabs-iis module (10.0.1) support the following options within "authenticationinfo":
['anonymous', 'basic', 'clientCertificateMapping','digest', 'iisClientCertificateMapping', 'windows']
per https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-iis/blob/main/lib/puppet_x/puppetlabs/iis/property/authenticationinfo.rb

I have nodes running Windows Server 2022 that have 'Forms Authentication' listed as an option, and I'd like to leverage the existing mechanism in this module to ensure that auth option is disabled instead of resorting to DSC.

Screenshot 2025-03-11 at 4 28 39 PM

Related Issues (if any)

#396

Checklist

  • 🟢 Spec tests.
  • 🟢 Acceptance tests.
  • Manually verified. (For example puppet apply)

@span786 span786 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 3, 2025 08:52
Copy link
Contributor

@amitkarsale amitkarsale left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@span786 span786 merged commit 743eee6 into main Mar 12, 2025
12 checks passed
@span786 span786 deleted the CAT-2218-support-managing-forms-within-authenticationinfo-for-puppetlabs-iis-resources-case-01325478 branch March 12, 2025 07:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants