Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

contrib: restructure Getting Started - Setup and Building into a Workflows section #1467

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nedbat
Copy link
Member

@nedbat nedbat commented Nov 4, 2024

The Getting Started section has a lot of technical detail. I thought it
would be better moved to the end, and referenced from the contribution
paths earlier in the guide. I haven't updated the paths yet.

Also:

  • I added a central links.rst that can be included anywhere.
  • I omitted the "Editors and tools" section. It doesn't provide any useful information.
  • Perhaps the Workflows section could be further categorized.
  • The c_blah_start and c_blah_end comments are only for the temporary inclusions being used to demonstrate the new organization.

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-devguide--1467.org.readthedocs.build/

This makes it easier to move content around without worrying about where
the links are defined.  It will also be easier to have canonical links
that can be used from multiple places in the guide.
…flows section

The Getting Started section has a lot of technical detail.  I thought it
would be better moved to the end, and referenced from the contribution
paths earlier in the guide.  I haven't updated the paths yet.

Also:

- I added a central links.rst that can be included anywhere.
- I omitted the "Editors and tools" section. It doesn't provide any useful information.
- Perhaps the Workflows section could be further categorized.
- The `c_blah_start` and `c_blah_end` comments are only for the temporary inclusions being used to demonstrate the new organization.
@willingc
Copy link
Collaborator

willingc commented Nov 4, 2024

@nedbat I did a quick scan and looked good. I'm traveling tomorrow so can look more closely then.

@nedbat nedbat marked this pull request as ready for review November 11, 2024 22:55
@nedbat nedbat marked this pull request as draft November 11, 2024 22:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants