[stubsabot] Bump protobuf to ~=6.33.5#14887
Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Open
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
the
bot: stubsabot
JelleZijlstra
force-pushed
the
stubsabot/protobuf
branch
from
70a50fa to
837eb16
Compare
github-actions
bot
changed the title
github-actions
bot
changed the title
JelleZijlstra
force-pushed
the
stubsabot/protobuf
branch
from
837eb16 to
fc72b3d
Compare
JelleZijlstra
force-pushed
the
stubsabot/protobuf
branch
from
fc72b3d to
a30ec61
Compare
github-actions
bot
changed the title
github-actions
bot
changed the title
JelleZijlstra
force-pushed
the
stubsabot/protobuf
branch
from
a30ec61 to
de9c113
Compare
Release: https://pypi.org/pypi/protobuf/6.33.5 Homepage: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/ Repository: https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf Typeshed stubs: https://github.com/python/typeshed/tree/main/stubs/protobuf If stubtest fails for this PR: - Leave this PR open (as a reminder, and to prevent stubsabot from opening another PR) - Fix stubtest failures in another PR, then close this PR Note that you will need to close and re-open the PR in order to trigger CI
JelleZijlstra
force-pushed
the
stubsabot/protobuf
branch
from
de9c113 to
eb4f9b5
Compare
github-actions
bot
changed the title
|
@JelleZijlstra or @srittau, sorry for the ping, but I was wondering if we could merge this? This vulnerability requires us to update protobuf at my work, and it would be nice to have the type stubs. CVE-2026-0994. Alternatively: Anything holding this back that I could help with? |
Collaborator
|
Someone needs to go through the diff (protocolbuffers/protobuf@v32.1...v33.5) and see whether there are any relevant changes for the typeshed stubs. We can't just bump the version number. That said, types-protobuf does not depend on protobuf, so it should be possible to install a newer protobuf version alongside the older stubs. |
|
Ah, now I see. I was confused from the existence of the original pr. I think you are correct in that I can use the older version! Sorry for the noise! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Release: https://pypi.org/pypi/protobuf/6.33.5
Homepage: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/
Repository: https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf
Typeshed stubs: https://github.com/python/typeshed/tree/main/stubs/protobuf
If stubtest fails for this PR:
Note that you will need to close and re-open the PR in order to trigger CI