Skip to content

Remove containerImages resource type from radius_compute manifests#11903

Open
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/remove-containerimages-yaml
Open

Remove containerImages resource type from radius_compute manifests#11903
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/remove-containerimages-yaml

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI commented May 14, 2026

Description

Drops the Radius.Compute/containerImages resource type from both built-in provider manifests. The type is no longer shipped as a built-in.

  • Removed the containerImages: block (schema, description, and 2025-08-01-preview API version) from:
    • deploy/manifest/built-in-providers/dev/radius_compute.yaml
    • deploy/manifest/built-in-providers/self-hosted/radius_compute.yaml
  • No Go code referenced the type; the only remaining mention is in the historical docs/release-notes/v0.57.0.md, which is intentionally preserved.

Type of change

  • This pull request is a minor refactor, code cleanup, test improvement, or other maintenance task and doesn't change the functionality of Radius (issue link optional).

Contributor checklist

Please verify that the PR meets the following requirements, where applicable:

  • An overview of proposed schema changes is included in a linked GitHub issue.
    • Yes
    • Not applicable
  • A design document is added or updated under eng/design-notes/ in this repository, if new APIs are being introduced.
    • Yes
    • Not applicable
  • The design document has been reviewed and approved by Radius maintainers/approvers.
    • Yes
    • Not applicable
  • A PR for resource-types-contrib is created, if resource types or recipes are affected by the changes in this PR.
    • Yes
    • Not applicable
  • A PR for dashboard is created, if the Radius Dashboard is affected by the changes in this PR.
    • Yes
    • Not applicable
  • A PR for the documentation repository is created, if the changes in this PR affect the documentation or any user facing updates are made.
    • Yes
    • Not applicable

@willdavsmith willdavsmith marked this pull request as ready for review May 14, 2026 18:39
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 14, 2026 18:39
@willdavsmith willdavsmith requested review from a team as code owners May 14, 2026 18:39
@willdavsmith willdavsmith requested a review from kachawla May 14, 2026 18:39
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Removes the Radius.Compute/containerImages built-in resource type from Radius.Compute provider manifests so it is no longer registered by default.

Changes:

  • Removed the containerImages type definition and 2025-08-01-preview schema from the dev manifest.
  • Removed the same built-in type definition from the self-hosted manifest.
  • Verified remaining references are limited to historical release notes.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
deploy/manifest/built-in-providers/dev/radius_compute.yaml Removes containerImages from the dev built-in Radius.Compute manifest.
deploy/manifest/built-in-providers/self-hosted/radius_compute.yaml Removes containerImages from the self-hosted built-in Radius.Compute manifest.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kachawla kachawla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you also republish the extension (radiusCompute) with this type removed?

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR requires exactly 1 of the following labels: pr:standard, pr:important.
Currently applied labels: .

Label descriptions:

  • pr:important - Major features, breaking changes, deprecations, or other high-impact changes that need special attention during release.
  • pr:standard - Ongoing maintenance, minor improvements, documentation updates, and routine development work.

@Copilot, please add the appropriate label to this PR before merging.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

@radius-functional-tests
Copy link
Copy Markdown

radius-functional-tests Bot commented May 15, 2026

Radius functional test overview

🔍 Go to test action run

Click here to see the test run details
Name Value
Repository radius-project/radius
Commit ref 8e0807b
Unique ID funcf83198e09f
Image tag pr-funcf83198e09f
  • gotestsum 1.13.0
  • KinD: v0.29.0
  • Dapr: 1.14.4
  • Azure KeyVault CSI driver: 1.4.2
  • Azure Workload identity webhook: 1.3.0
  • Bicep recipe location ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/test/testrecipes/test-bicep-recipes/<name>:pr-funcf83198e09f
  • Terraform recipe location http://tf-module-server.radius-test-tf-module-server.svc.cluster.local/<name>.zip (in cluster)
  • applications-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/applications-rp:pr-funcf83198e09f
  • dynamic-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/dynamic-rp:pr-funcf83198e09f
  • controller test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/controller:pr-funcf83198e09f
  • ucp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/ucpd:pr-funcf83198e09f
  • deployment-engine test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/deployment-engine:latest

Test Status

⌛ Building Radius and pushing container images for functional tests...
✅ Container images build succeeded
⌛ Publishing Bicep Recipes for functional tests...
✅ Recipe publishing succeeded
⌛ Starting ucp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting corerp-cloud functional tests...
✅ ucp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ corerp-cloud functional tests succeeded

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 15, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 51.70%. Comparing base (48bcd09) to head (8e0807b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #11903      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   51.74%   51.70%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         726      726              
  Lines       45605    45605              
==========================================
- Hits        23597    23582      -15     
- Misses      19788    19796       +8     
- Partials     2220     2227       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Unit Tests

    2 files  ±0    422 suites  ±0   7m 19s ⏱️ +2s
5 127 tests ±0  5 125 ✅ ±0  2 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
6 156 runs  ±0  6 154 ✅ ±0  2 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 8e0807b. ± Comparison against base commit 48bcd09.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants