-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 588
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add benchmark for public and private key parsing #4793
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
f90edeb
to
2390aa9
Compare
reneme
approved these changes
Mar 27, 2025
…SN.1 case For every other constructor we are willing to assume the bit length is public; this just pessimizes the case when the key is loaded from PKCS8
Historically this function made some attempts to be constant-time-ish (despite not being constant time at all), largely because it was the only implemented division algorithm. Now we have dedicated constant time division algorithms which are used for secret data; we can readily assume the inputs to vartime_divide are public.
2390aa9
to
bc97a9b
Compare
reneme
reviewed
Mar 28, 2025
Comment on lines
+283
to
+289
for(size_t k = 0; k != 2; ++k) { | ||
if(division_check_vartime(qjt, y_t0, y_t1, x_j0, x_j1, x_j2)) { | ||
qjt--; | ||
} else { | ||
break; | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code is a bit cleaner without the upper bound
😁
Suggested change
for(size_t k = 0; k != 2; ++k) { | |
if(division_check_vartime(qjt, y_t0, y_t1, x_j0, x_j1, x_j2)) { | |
qjt--; | |
} else { | |
break; | |
} | |
} | |
for(size_t k = 0; k != 2 && ! division_check_vartime(qjt, y_t0, y_t1, x_j0, x_j1, x_j2); ++k, --gjt); | |
BOTAN_DEBUG_ASSERT(!division_check(qjt, y_t0, y_t1, x_j0, x_j1, x_j2)); |
... I'm not sure. 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am sure that is fucking hideous :)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Plus various optimizations driven by this