[TypeDeclaration] Skip with include on SafeDeclareStrictTypesRector

[samsonasik]

No description provided.

[TomasVotruba]

👍

[samsonasik]

Fixed 🎉 /cc @calebdw

[samsonasik]

@TomasVotruba ready 👍

[TomasVotruba]

LGTM 👍

[calebdw]

@samsonasik, did you actually run into a PHP error or are you just preemptively making this change?

My testing shows that this should not have been merged---declare(strict_types=1) only affects the file that it is defined in and not code in other files

mkdir -p /tmp/strict-test && cd /tmp/strict-test

# A non-strict included file that uses type coercion internally
cat > included.php << 'PHP'
<?php
function greet(string $name): string {
    return "Hello, " . $name;
}
// Type coercion (int -> string) works because THIS file is non-strict
echo greet(123) . "\n";
PHP

# Main file WITHOUT strict_types
cat > without_strict.php << 'PHP'
<?php
include __DIR__ . '/included.php';
echo greet("world") . "\n";
PHP

# Main file WITH strict_types (what Rector would produce)
cat > with_strict.php << 'PHP'
<?php
declare(strict_types=1);
include __DIR__ . '/included.php';
echo greet("world") . "\n";
PHP

php without_strict.php
# Hello, 123
# Hello, world

php with_strict.php
# Hello, 123   <-- included file's internal call still works with NO errors!
# Hello, world

In short, it is perfectly safe to add declare(strict_types=1); to a file that includes non-strict code as long as that file itself uses strict types

[samsonasik]

@calebdw I see, I just realize that declare(strict_types=1) is file scoped, let's revert :)

[calebdw]

Thanks! I've found it's important to test assumption about strict_types because it's not always immediately obvious

[TomasVotruba]

@calebdw Btw, I'd love to give this rule more attention. Would you open to write a simple post how/why it works, that we could publish on https://getrector.com/blog under your name?
I think people should know about this gold :)

[calebdw]

Wow, I would love to! I've never written a blog post before though 😅, any tips?

[TomasVotruba]

@calebdw Awesome, you'll be fine 👍 Looks like you have the skill already, based on clear descriptiosn of your PR 👍

You can kick off with this structure:

• Why it's important?
• How it works?
• 2-3 examples
• Try it :)