fix: Renaming both struct and function with the same name #19306
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #18892.
Note
Although the original issue did not specify whether to rename both definitions or only one, since the original code exports both under the same name, it is preferable for rust-analyzer’s behavior to rename both.
This implementation therefore renames both the struct and the function, ensuring consistency.
Important
This implementation is limited to handling struct/function pairs. It does not cover other combinations (e.g. enum variants with associated functions, constants paired with functions, or trait methods).
If needed, separate issues should be created to address those other cases individually.