Skip to content

Conversation

Enselic
Copy link
Member

@Enselic Enselic commented Jul 27, 2023

The test is a regression test for a bug where the compiler gave bad advice for an Option<&String>. Rename the file appropriately.

Part of #73494

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 27, 2023

r? @eholk

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 27, 2023
@Enselic
Copy link
Member Author

Enselic commented Jul 27, 2023

@rustbot label -T-bootstrap

@rustbot rustbot removed the T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) label Jul 27, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 28, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #114144) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@eholk
Copy link
Contributor

eholk commented Aug 4, 2023

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 4, 2023

📌 Commit bde557b5ea2420cb29a68eb68f0c5e6cdc59504a has been approved by eholk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 4, 2023
@eholk
Copy link
Contributor

eholk commented Aug 4, 2023

Ah, looks like there are conflicts. Feel free to r=me after resolving them.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) label Aug 4, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 4, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #114481) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 4, 2023
@Enselic
Copy link
Member Author

Enselic commented Aug 5, 2023

Thanks for review!

@bors r=eholk

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 5, 2023

@Enselic: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: Not in reviewers

@Enselic
Copy link
Member Author

Enselic commented Aug 5, 2023

@eholk (You need to @bors delegate+ me first)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 5, 2023

@Enselic: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: Not in reviewers

@Enselic
Copy link
Member Author

Enselic commented Aug 5, 2023

@rustbot ready (see #114143 (comment))

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Aug 5, 2023
@eholk
Copy link
Contributor

eholk commented Aug 5, 2023

@bors r+

Sorry about that!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 5, 2023

📌 Commit 76ce67292cd220f5e8635c88423948e6d02c1525 has been approved by eholk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 5, 2023
@klensy
Copy link
Contributor

klensy commented Aug 5, 2023

The test is a regression test for a bug where the compiler gave bad
advice for an `Option<&String>`. Rename the file appropriately.
@Enselic Enselic force-pushed the rename-issue-100605 branch from 76ce672 to 6ba393c Compare August 5, 2023 13:36
@Enselic
Copy link
Member Author

Enselic commented Aug 5, 2023

@klensy Done! Would be good to let PR CI catch this if it is a strict policy.

@eholk You need to r+ again!

@klensy
Copy link
Contributor

klensy commented Aug 5, 2023

@klensy Done! Would be good to let PR CI catch this if it is a strict policy.

#114157

@eholk
Copy link
Contributor

eholk commented Aug 5, 2023

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 5, 2023

📌 Commit 6ba393c has been approved by eholk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@eholk
Copy link
Contributor

eholk commented Aug 5, 2023

@bors delegate @Enselic

(Just in case you need another r+)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 5, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 6ba393c with merge 9565b68...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 5, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: eholk
Pushing 9565b68 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Aug 5, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 9565b68 into rust-lang:master Aug 5, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.73.0 milestone Aug 5, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (9565b68): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.2% [-0.2%, -0.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.2% [-0.2%, -0.2%] 1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.5% [3.5%, 3.5%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.5% [3.5%, 3.5%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.4% [3.4%, 3.4%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.4% [3.4%, 3.4%] 1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 648.941s -> 649.206s (0.04%)

@Enselic Enselic deleted the rename-issue-100605 branch August 6, 2023 05:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants