-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
some trait system cleanups #120463
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
some trait system cleanups #120463
Changes from all commits
486c7b6
399a258
df55f56
9771fb0
0c7672a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ mod engine; | |
pub mod error_reporting; | ||
mod fulfill; | ||
pub mod misc; | ||
pub mod normalize; | ||
mod object_safety; | ||
pub mod outlives_bounds; | ||
pub mod project; | ||
|
@@ -40,17 +41,15 @@ use rustc_span::Span; | |
use std::fmt::Debug; | ||
use std::ops::ControlFlow; | ||
|
||
pub(crate) use self::project::{needs_normalization, BoundVarReplacer, PlaceholderReplacer}; | ||
|
||
pub use self::coherence::{add_placeholder_note, orphan_check, overlapping_impls}; | ||
pub use self::coherence::{OrphanCheckErr, OverlapResult}; | ||
pub use self::engine::{ObligationCtxt, TraitEngineExt}; | ||
pub use self::fulfill::{FulfillmentContext, PendingPredicateObligation}; | ||
pub use self::normalize::NormalizeExt; | ||
pub use self::object_safety::astconv_object_safety_violations; | ||
pub use self::object_safety::is_vtable_safe_method; | ||
pub use self::object_safety::object_safety_violations_for_assoc_item; | ||
pub use self::object_safety::ObjectSafetyViolation; | ||
pub use self::project::NormalizeExt; | ||
pub use self::project::{normalize_inherent_projection, normalize_projection_type}; | ||
pub use self::select::{EvaluationCache, SelectionCache, SelectionContext}; | ||
pub use self::select::{EvaluationResult, IntercrateAmbiguityCause, OverflowError}; | ||
|
@@ -68,6 +67,7 @@ pub use self::util::{ | |
}; | ||
pub use self::util::{expand_trait_aliases, TraitAliasExpander}; | ||
pub use self::util::{get_vtable_index_of_object_method, impl_item_is_final, upcast_choices}; | ||
pub use self::util::{with_replaced_escaping_bound_vars, BoundVarReplacer, PlaceholderReplacer}; | ||
|
||
pub use rustc_infer::traits::*; | ||
|
||
|
@@ -119,60 +119,16 @@ pub fn predicates_for_generics<'tcx>( | |
|
||
/// Determines whether the type `ty` is known to meet `bound` and | ||
/// returns true if so. Returns false if `ty` either does not meet | ||
/// `bound` or is not known to meet bound (note that this is | ||
/// conservative towards *no impl*, which is the opposite of the | ||
/// `evaluate` methods). | ||
/// `bound` or is not known to meet bound. | ||
pub fn type_known_to_meet_bound_modulo_regions<'tcx>( | ||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>, | ||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, | ||
ty: Ty<'tcx>, | ||
def_id: DefId, | ||
) -> bool { | ||
let trait_ref = ty::TraitRef::new(infcx.tcx, def_id, [ty]); | ||
pred_known_to_hold_modulo_regions(infcx, param_env, trait_ref) | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// FIXME(@lcnr): this function doesn't seem right and shouldn't exist? | ||
/// | ||
/// Ping me on zulip if you want to use this method and need help with finding | ||
/// an appropriate replacement. | ||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(infcx, param_env, pred), ret)] | ||
fn pred_known_to_hold_modulo_regions<'tcx>( | ||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>, | ||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, | ||
pred: impl ToPredicate<'tcx>, | ||
) -> bool { | ||
let obligation = Obligation::new(infcx.tcx, ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, pred); | ||
|
||
let result = infcx.evaluate_obligation_no_overflow(&obligation); | ||
debug!(?result); | ||
|
||
if result.must_apply_modulo_regions() { | ||
true | ||
} else if result.may_apply() { | ||
// Sometimes obligations are ambiguous because the recursive evaluator | ||
// is not smart enough, so we fall back to fulfillment when we're not certain | ||
// that an obligation holds or not. Even still, we must make sure that | ||
// the we do no inference in the process of checking this obligation. | ||
let goal = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible((obligation.predicate, obligation.param_env)); | ||
infcx.probe(|_| { | ||
let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(infcx); | ||
ocx.register_obligation(obligation); | ||
|
||
let errors = ocx.select_all_or_error(); | ||
match errors.as_slice() { | ||
// Only known to hold if we did no inference. | ||
[] => infcx.shallow_resolve(goal) == goal, | ||
|
||
errors => { | ||
debug!(?errors); | ||
false | ||
} | ||
} | ||
}) | ||
} else { | ||
false | ||
} | ||
let obligation = Obligation::new(infcx.tcx, ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, trait_ref); | ||
infcx.predicate_must_hold_modulo_regions(&obligation) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There's a fair chance this will cause regression bc we're no longer falling back to fulfillment in the local infcx lol There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. we could do a crater run? think it's fine though, reverting this is straightforward 😀 |
||
} | ||
|
||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(tcx, elaborated_env))] | ||
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.