Skip to content

Refinement of Providers into Providers and ExternProviders #2469

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
108 changes: 76 additions & 32 deletions src/query.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -71,22 +71,24 @@ are cheaply cloneable; insert an `Rc` if necessary).

If, however, the query is *not* in the cache, then the compiler will
call the corresponding **provider** function. A provider is a function
implemented in a specific module and **manually registered** into the
[`Providers`][providers_struct] struct during compiler initialization.
The macro system generates the [`Providers`][providers_struct] struct,
which acts as a function table for all query implementations, where each
implemented in a specific module and **manually registered** into either
the [`Providers`][providers_struct] struct (for local crate queries) or
the [`ExternProviders`][extern_providers_struct] struct (for external crate queries)
during compiler initialization. The macro system generates both structs,
which act as function tables for all query implementations, where each
field is a function pointer to the actual provider.

**Note:** The `Providers` struct is generated by macros and acts as a function table for all query implementations.
It is **not** a Rust trait, but a plain struct with function pointer fields.
**Note:** Both the `Providers` and `ExternProviders` structs are generated by macros and act as function tables for all query implementations.
They are **not** Rust traits, but plain structs with function pointer fields.

**Providers are defined per-crate.** The compiler maintains,
internally, a table of providers for every crate, at least
conceptually. Right now, there are really two sets: the providers for
queries about the **local crate** (that is, the one being compiled)
and providers for queries about **external crates** (that is,
dependencies of the local crate). Note that what determines the crate
that a query is targeting is not the *kind* of query, but the *key*.
conceptually. There are two sets of providers:
- The `Providers` struct for queries about the **local crate** (that is, the one being compiled)
- The `ExternProviders` struct for queries about **external crates** (that is,
dependencies of the local crate)

Note that what determines the crate that a query is targeting is not the *kind* of query, but the *key*.
For example, when you invoke `tcx.type_of(def_id)`, that could be a
local query or an external query, depending on what crate the `def_id`
is referring to (see the [`self::keys::Key`][Key] trait for more
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -119,59 +121,101 @@ they define both a `provide` and a `provide_extern` function, through

### How providers are set up

When the tcx is created, it is given the providers by its creator using
the [`Providers`][providers_struct] struct. This struct is generated by
the macros here, but it is basically a big list of function pointers:

[providers_struct]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/query/struct.Providers.html
When the tcx is created, it is given both the local and external providers by its creator using
the `Providers` struct from `rustc_middle::util`. This struct contains both the local and external providers:

```rust,ignore
struct Providers {
type_of: for<'tcx> fn(TyCtxt<'tcx>, DefId) -> Ty<'tcx>,
// ... one field for each query
pub struct Providers {
pub queries: crate::query::Providers, // Local crate providers
pub extern_queries: crate::query::ExternProviders, // External crate providers
pub hooks: crate::hooks::Providers,
}
```

Each of these provider structs is generated by the macros and contains function pointers for their respective queries.

#### How are providers registered?

The `Providers` struct is filled in during compiler initialization, mainly by the `rustc_driver` crate.
The provider structs are filled in during compiler initialization, mainly by the `rustc_driver` crate.
But the actual provider functions are implemented in various `rustc_*` crates (like `rustc_middle`, `rustc_hir_analysis`, etc).

To register providers, each crate exposes a [`provide`][provide_fn] function that looks like this:

[provide_fn]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/hir/fn.provide.html

```rust,ignore
pub fn provide(providers: &mut Providers) {
*providers = Providers {
type_of,
// ... add more providers here
..*providers
};
pub fn provide(providers: &mut rustc_middle::util::Providers) {
providers.queries.type_of = type_of;
// ... add more local providers here

providers.extern_queries.type_of = extern_type_of;
// ... add more external providers here

providers.hooks.some_hook = some_hook;
// ... add more hooks here
}
```

- This function takes a mutable reference to the `Providers` struct and sets the fields to point to the correct provider functions.
- You can also assign fields individually, e.g. `providers.type_of = type_of;`.
- You can assign fields individually for each provider type (local, external, and hooks).

#### Adding a new provider

Suppose you want to add a new query called `fubar`. You would:

1. Implement the provider function:
```rust,ignore
fn fubar<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, key: DefId) -> Fubar<'tcx> { ... }
fn fubar<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, key: LocalDefId) -> Fubar<'tcx> { ... }
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and then make this a DefId

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tshepang suggest to make it LocalDefId. #2465 (comment)

I just went through the source code and realized that the key for local providers is pretty much LocalDefId. Which one are we going to choose?

```
2. Register it in the `provide` function:
```rust,ignore
pub fn provide(providers: &mut Providers) {
*providers = Providers {
fubar,
..*providers
pub fn provide(providers: &mut rustc_middle::util::Providers) {
providers.queries.fubar = fubar;
}
```

### How queries interact with external crate metadata

When a query is made for an external crate (i.e., a dependency), the query system needs to load the information from that crate's metadata.
This is handled by the [`rustc_metadata` crate][rustc_metadata], which is responsible for decoding and providing the information stored in the `.rmeta` files.

The process works like this:

1. When a query is made, the query system first checks if the `DefId` refers to a local or external crate by checking if `def_id.krate == LOCAL_CRATE`.
This determines whether to use the local provider from [`Providers`][providers_struct] or the external provider from [`ExternProviders`][extern_providers_struct].

2. For external crates, the query system will look for a provider in the [`ExternProviders`][extern_providers_struct] struct.
The `rustc_metadata` crate registers these external providers through the `provide_extern` function in `rustc_metadata/src/rmeta/decoder/cstore_impl.rs`. Just like:
```rust
pub fn provide_extern(providers: &mut ExternProviders) {
providers.foo = |tcx, def_id| {
// Load and decode metadata for external crate
let cdata = CStore::from_tcx(tcx).get_crate_data(def_id.krate);
cdata.foo(def_id.index)
};
// Register other external providers...
}
```

3. The metadata is stored in a binary format in `.rmeta` files that contains pre-computed information about the external crate, such as types, function signatures, trait implementations, and other information needed by the compiler. When an external query is made, the `rustc_metadata` crate:
- Loads the `.rmeta` file for the external crate
- Decodes the metadata using the `Decodable` trait
- Returns the decoded information to the query system

This approach avoids recompiling external crates, allows for faster compilation of dependent crates, and enables incremental compilation to work across crate boundaries.
Here is a simplified example, when you call `tcx.type_of(def_id)` for a type defined in an external crate, the query system will:
1. Detect that the `def_id` refers to an external crate by checking `def_id.krate != LOCAL_CRATE`
2. Call the appropriate provider from `ExternProviders` which was registered by `rustc_metadata`
3. The provider will load and decode the type information from the external crate's metadata
4. Return the decoded type to the caller

This is why most `rustc_*` crates only need to provide local providers - the external providers are handled by the metadata system.
The only exception is when a crate needs to provide special handling for external queries, in which case it would implement both local and external providers.

[rustc_metadata]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_metadata/index.html
[providers_struct]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/query/struct.Providers.html
[extern_providers_struct]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/query/struct.ExternProviders.html
Comment on lines +177 to +217
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I read the code in rustc_metadata related to the extern providers and added it to the new commit, but I'm not sure there are parts I wrote correctly, if you have time to look at it. Thanks @Noratrieb


---

## Adding a new query
Expand Down