Skip to content

Conversation

@saurabharch
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • packages/react-scripts/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
critical severity Predictable Value Range from Previous Values
SNYK-JS-FORMDATA-10841150
  863  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @saurabharch, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, aims to enhance the project's security posture by updating a key dependency. The primary objective is to resolve a critical vulnerability by upgrading the jest package to a more secure version.

Highlights

  • Security Upgrade: Upgraded the jest testing framework from version 22.4.3 to 26.0.0.
  • Vulnerability Fix: This upgrade addresses a critical security vulnerability, SNYK-JS-FORMDATA-10841150, described as 'Predictable Value Range from Previous Values', which was identified by Snyk.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, upgrades jest from version 22.4.3 to 26.0.0 to resolve a security vulnerability. While the upgrade is important, this is a major version jump that introduces significant breaking changes. My review highlights critical compatibility issues with related packages and configuration files that must be addressed to prevent the test suite from breaking. Specifically, babel-jest needs to be updated, and Jest configuration files require changes to adapt to the new version.

"identity-obj-proxy": "3.0.0",
"loader-utils": "^1.1.0",
"jest": "22.4.3",
"jest": "26.0.0",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

While upgrading jest is necessary for security, this major version jump from 22.x to 26.x introduces several breaking changes that will likely break the test suite. The automated update only changes the jest package, but other changes are required for this to work.

Here are the critical issues that need to be addressed:

  1. babel-jest incompatibility: The babel-jest package version should match the jest major version. It is currently 22.4.3 (line 29) and needs to be upgraded to 26.0.0 to be compatible with [email protected].

  2. Jest configuration breaking change: Jest 24 renamed the setupTestFrameworkScriptFile configuration option to setupFilesAfterEnv. The current configuration in packages/react-scripts/scripts/utils/createJestConfig.js (line 29) uses the old key, which will be ignored by Jest 26. This will prevent test setup files from running, likely causing test failures.

  3. Potentially obsolete workaround: The script packages/react-scripts/scripts/test.js contains a workaround (lines 61-113) for a Jest issue (Add Cluster Module to Webpack node Configuration facebook/create-react-app#5913) that was fixed in Jest 23. This workaround may no longer be necessary and could cause issues with Jest 26.

I strongly recommend addressing these issues in this PR to ensure the tests continue to function correctly after this upgrade.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants