Skip to content

fix Scaladoc generation (and check it in CI) #584

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2025
Merged

fix Scaladoc generation (and check it in CI) #584

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion .github/workflows/ci.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -23,4 +23,4 @@ jobs:
java-version: ${{matrix.java}}
- uses: sbt/setup-sbt@v1
- name: Test
run: sbt ++${{matrix.scala}} test headerCheck versionPolicyCheck package
run: sbt ++${{matrix.scala}} test doc headerCheck versionPolicyCheck package
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions build.sbt
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ lazy val parserCombinators = crossProject(JVMPlatform, JSPlatform, NativePlatfor
// go nearly warning-free, but only on 2.13, it's too hard across all versions
Compile / scalacOptions ++= (CrossVersion.partialVersion(scalaVersion.value) match {
case Some((2, 13)) => Seq("-Werror", "-Wunused",
// ideally we'd do something about this. `^?` is the responsible method
"-Wconf:site=scala.util.parsing.combinator.Parsers.*&cat=lint-multiarg-infix:i",
// not sure what resolving this would look like? didn't think about it too hard
"-Wconf:site=scala.util.parsing.combinator.lexical.StdLexical.*&cat=other-match-analysis:i",
)
Expand Down
Loading