Add an example for arbitrary type validation upon deserialization.#148
Open
nathan-at-least wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Add an example for arbitrary type validation upon deserialization.#148nathan-at-least wants to merge 1 commit into
nathan-at-least wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
I think this is pretty useful, but it might be worth mentioning serde-rs/serde#2178 as a limitation. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds an example for a useful pattern where a type needs to be validated arbitrarily (via
TryFromon an inner type) during deserialization. This comes directly from serde-rs/serde#642 (comment) where I learned the pattern.I couldn't figure out on my own how to do this via browsing https://serde.rs, so I went to the issue tracker where I found this recipe, so it seems like a good candidate for the examples section.