[Test] Testing the generalization of fused moe #167
Merged
+204
−118
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
Warning You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again! |
Yael-X
previously approved these changes
Nov 7, 2025
Yael-X
approved these changes
Nov 18, 2025
Yael-X
reviewed
Nov 18, 2025
Yael-X
previously approved these changes
Nov 18, 2025
Yael-X
approved these changes
Nov 24, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add testing fused moe:
Generalization for hiddensize
Test for eplb. Because the small operator does not support the scenario where topk=-1, in the test cases we use global_base_prefix_sum to calculate eplb and compare the results with the fusion operator. Since the output of the fusion operator eplb is an auto ep_recv_count = at::empty({num_local_experts * num_ranks}, at::dtype(at::kInt).device(device)); shape=[num_local_experts * num_ranks] one-dimensional tensor, but global_base_prefix_sum is a shape=[num_local_experts, num_ranks], we perform some preprocessing on global_base_prefix_sum to match the fusion operator ep_recv_count.