Skip to content

Update API from slack-api-ref@bd5dd34 - #574

Merged
dblock merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
automated-api-update
Nov 15, 2025
Merged

dblock merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
automated-api-update

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Sep 29, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Update API from slack-api-ref.
Rev: bd5dd34
Date: 2025-11-10

@coveralls

coveralls commented Sep 29, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 19249376579

Details

  • 92 of 97 (94.85%) changed or added relevant lines in 8 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.05%) to 90.958%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
lib/slack/web/api/endpoints/admin_users.rb 1 2 50.0%
lib/slack/web/api/endpoints/chat.rb 14 18 77.78%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 18762970635: 0.05%
Covered Lines: 5070
Relevant Lines: 5574

💛 - Coveralls

@bjedrocha

bjedrocha commented Nov 12, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@dblock would it be possible to get this merged into master and cut a new release of the gem? Slack has introduced startStream, appendStream, and stopStream methods to the chat endpoint that we would love to start using.

The contributing doc doesn't mention how y'all deal with these automated api updates but if you need me to create a PR just with the changes to the chat endpoint please let me know and I can put something up. Thank you.

@dblock

dblock commented Nov 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll merge and do a release this weekend unless another maintainer beats me to it.

@dblock
dblock merged commit eded467 into master Nov 15, 2025
21 checks passed
@dblock

dblock commented Nov 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I've released 3.1.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants