Skip to content

update aptos mcms#836

Merged
FelixFan1992 merged 6 commits intomainfrom
update-aptos-mcms
Mar 10, 2026
Merged

update aptos mcms#836
FelixFan1992 merged 6 commits intomainfrom
update-aptos-mcms

Conversation

@FelixFan1992
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 6, 2026

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 590ad50

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
chainlink-deployments-framework Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@FelixFan1992 FelixFan1992 marked this pull request as ready for review March 9, 2026 22:40
@FelixFan1992 FelixFan1992 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 9, 2026 22:40
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 9, 2026 22:40
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the Aptos MCMS integration to support selecting an MCMS “type” derived from proposal operations (including “curse” MCMS), alongside bumping the relevant dependencies to versions that expose the required APIs.

Changes:

  • Bump github.com/smartcontractkit/mcms and related dependencies (including Aptos SDK / Chainlink Aptos) in go.mod/go.sum.
  • Update Aptos inspector/executor construction to pass an MCMS type computed from proposal operations.
  • Add a changeset documenting the patch-level change.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
go.mod Updates MCMS + Aptos-related and other transitive dependency versions needed for the new Aptos MCMS behavior.
go.sum Syncs checksums with the dependency updates in go.mod (and resulting go mod tidy resolution).
engine/cld/commands/mcms/chain_helpers.go Computes mcmsType from operations and uses the new Aptos constructor APIs that accept MCMS type.
.changeset/seven-parents-grab.md Documents the patch change for the deployments framework package.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@FelixFan1992 FelixFan1992 enabled auto-merge March 9, 2026 22:44
moby/go-archive v0.2.0 removed the deprecated archive.Gzip alias that
docker/cli@v28.5.x still references, causing build failures in
downstream consumers (e.g. chainlink/system-tests).

Made-with: Cursor
@FelixFan1992 FelixFan1992 added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 10, 2026
@cl-sonarqube-production
Copy link

Quality Gate failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube

Merged via the queue into main with commit 27021a9 Mar 10, 2026
20 of 21 checks passed
@FelixFan1992 FelixFan1992 deleted the update-aptos-mcms branch March 10, 2026 00:34
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2026
This PR was opened by the [Changesets
release](https://github.com/changesets/action) GitHub action. When
you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will
be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release
yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will
be updated.


# Releases
## chainlink-deployments-framework@0.86.0

### Minor Changes

-
[#826](#826)
[`bc7e435`](bc7e435)
Thanks [@ajaskolski](https://github.com/ajaskolski)! - feat: extract
from cld ccip and make domain agnostic verification cmd for contracts

### Patch Changes

-
[#836](#836)
[`27021a9`](27021a9)
Thanks [@FelixFan1992](https://github.com/FelixFan1992)! - update aptos
mcms to also handle curse mcms

---------

Co-authored-by: app-token-issuer-engops[bot] <144731339+app-token-issuer-engops[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants