You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since the CLI is unifying on a standard and improved tooling, we're starting to migrate old-style imports and exports to ES6 ones.
A file you've modified is using either module.exports or require(). If you can, please update them to ES6 import syntax and export syntax.
Files found:
j-luong
changed the title
spike: configure ts-binary-wrapper to validate linuxstatic binaries
chore(spike): configure ts-binary-wrapper to validate linuxstatic binaries
May 7, 2026
The build-binary-wrapper target now explicitly depends on experimental linux binaries (experimental/snyk-linux and experimental/snyk-linux-arm64). However, there are no rules in the Makefile to produce these files, and the local build script scripts/build-ts-binary-wrapper-locally.go only creates the .sha256 metadata files, not the actual binaries. This will cause make build-binary-wrapper to fail with a 'No rule to make target' error unless those files are manually placed in the output folder.
In getCurrentConfiguration, the logic for mapping x64 to amd64 is manually implemented. This duplicates existing logic found in determineBinaryName (line 92 in context). Future changes to architecture support (e.g., adding armv7) would require updating both locations, increasing the risk of synchronization bugs.
The method getShasumFile() was changed to return an array of strings (string[]) representing the expected hashes, rather than a file path. The name of the method remains getShasumFile, which is now semantically incorrect and conflicts with the module-level constant shasumFile. It should be renamed to something like getExpectedShasums().
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request Submission Checklist
are release-note ready, emphasizing
what was changed, not how.
What does this PR do?
Where should the reviewer start?
How should this be manually tested?
What's the product update that needs to be communicated to CLI users?