Skip to content

Conversation

@pie6k
Copy link

@pie6k pie6k commented Nov 4, 2025

Checklist:

  • I've read and understood Contributing Guidelines.
  • I've added the new resource at the end of its section.
  • This resource is out there for a while, and actively maintained.
  • ~~~ This resource is popular enough and has at least a few hundred stars on GitHub.

I've created a solid SuperJSON alternative and want to give it a chance to get popular

...

@Ashe-reset
Copy link

Ashe-reset commented Nov 4, 2025 via email

@pie6k
Copy link
Author

pie6k commented Nov 17, 2025

Any update ?

@pie6k pie6k changed the title add-codables add codablejson Nov 17, 2025
@gokaygurcan
Copy link
Collaborator

No update, I'm still thinking about this one. We've added a few resources that were/are relevant and could add value to the list even without enough popularity. But here, motivation seems like to make it popular through this list, instead of getting enough traction before showing up in there. That seems odd to me. The purpose of the list is not to distribute your project, it's to showcase people what could and have been done with JavaScript/TypeScript.

WDYT?

@pie6k
Copy link
Author

pie6k commented Nov 17, 2025

I am fine waiting for it to gain more traction first, I understand you.

While it's true for me as an author that I want it to get popular, I also believe it delivers a solid and straightforward value

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants