Add @Order for built-in customizer beans#50913
Closed
quaff wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
To allow user defined customizers running after them. Signed-off-by: Yanming Zhou <zhouyanming@gmail.com>
spring-projects-issues
added
the
status: waiting-for-triage
Member
|
Sorry, I've apparently misunderstood things. I expected this PR to be a subset of #50913, but this is far broader in scope. I don't think adding I'm going to decline this one as I don't think a change of this scope is a good use of the team's time. I would prefer to deal with these as and when a user is affected by the current ordering. We can then consider them on a case-by-case basis and when we know that doing so would be time well spent. |
wilkinsona
added
status: declined
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To allow user defined customizers running after them.
See #50910 (comment)