feat(browser): fence client page placements - #14529
Draft
Jinwoo-H wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
Jinwoo-H
force-pushed
the
sta-4150-browser-page-placement-fencing
branch
2 times, most recently
from
August 14, 2026 20:14
17ac3c7 to
6e8d6f5
Compare
Jinwoo-H
force-pushed
the
sta-4150-browser-page-placement-fencing
branch
3 times, most recently
from
August 15, 2026 00:44
b328172 to
e085108
Compare
Jinwoo-H
force-pushed
the
sta-4150-browser-page-placement-fencing
branch
from
August 15, 2026 00:57
e085108 to
facc602
Compare
Jinwoo-H
force-pushed
the
sta-4150-browser-page-placement-fencing
branch
from
August 15, 2026 02:57
facc602 to
0d3b7e6
Compare
Jinwoo-H
force-pushed
the
sta-4150-browser-page-placement-fencing
branch
from
August 15, 2026 03:24
0d3b7e6 to
dd242be
Compare
Jinwoo-H
force-pushed
the
sta-4150-browser-page-placement-fencing
branch
2 times, most recently
from
August 15, 2026 10:24
4059baa to
bcf34b1
Compare
Jinwoo-H
force-pushed
the
sta-4150-browser-page-placement-fencing
branch
from
August 15, 2026 11:34
bcf34b1 to
339979f
Compare
Jinwoo-H
force-pushed
the
sta-4150-browser-page-placement-fencing
branch
from
August 15, 2026 12:30
339979f to
ec3bed2
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This is the next inert STA-4150 lifecycle boundary. It adds no exchanged field, RPC/event, capability advertisement, Electron IPC, renderer surface, or production caller. Server placement remains the default and existing old-client/server behavior is unchanged.
Why
The preceding route/WebContents stages can fence an active or retiring tuple, but the future IPC/control adapter still needs runtime-owned lifetime authority after retirement settles. Before this change there was no atomic API that joined logical placement identity to the current live browser-host lease, page placements were unbounded, and page/host IDs were not validated at this boundary.
T3Code independently validates the broad split—server-owned logical tab state with a desktop-renderer-owned Electron webview—but its renderer mounts the target URL and later registers
{tabId, webContentsId}. Orca intentionally keeps the stricter blank → main-derived exact registration → navigation-grant sequence because remotelocalhost, DNS, and private traffic must never escape through the desktop network.Evidence
5683c491ddbecause exact live authority, bounds, and identity validation did not existCompatibility and activation gates
docs/reference/remote-wire-compatibility.mdremains satisfied without negotiationActivation remains blocked on capability-qualified host selection, authenticated capability-gated command delivery, main-owned renderer/page grants, displaced-page teardown and acknowledgement, request/worker/download/storage settlement, reconnect inventory, and real Electron/CDP plus headed/headless/browserless and physical cross-platform traffic proof.
Linear: STA-4150