Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow Actor Roll Data in Resource Cost Fields #260

Open
1 task done
Khunkurisu opened this issue Feb 18, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
1 task done

Allow Actor Roll Data in Resource Cost Fields #260

Khunkurisu opened this issue Feb 18, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
api Enhancement Improvements not directly related to features/bugs ui User interface related issue ux User experience related issue
Milestone

Comments

@Khunkurisu
Copy link

Khunkurisu commented Feb 18, 2025

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
There are several abilities which cost a number of focus equal to a skill's rank.

Describe the solution you'd like
Simply enable entering roll data into the cost field so that this can be automated.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Currently we just set it to cost 1 and allow them to manually adjust the remainder. This works fine.

Version
0.3.0

Additional context
N/A

Checklist:

  • I have searched the existing issues to ensure this feature has not already been requested.
@zithith zithith added ui User interface related issue ux User experience related issue api Enhancement Improvements not directly related to features/bugs labels Feb 20, 2025
@zithith zithith added this to the post v1 milestone Feb 20, 2025
@zithith
Copy link
Contributor

zithith commented Feb 20, 2025

As this can be manually tracked and there's even a helper button in the chat messages for this, I'm setting it for post 1.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api Enhancement Improvements not directly related to features/bugs ui User interface related issue ux User experience related issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants