Refactor async example to use main function - #56
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe README's async usage example has been refactored from a synchronous-style top-level context manager pattern to a proper Python async pattern. The code now defines an 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 40: The snippet uses a synchronous context manager syntax "with
async_playwright() as p" which is incorrect; change it to use the asynchronous
context manager form "async with async_playwright() as p" (and ensure the
containing function is declared async) so the async_playwright() async context
manager is entered correctly—look for the "with async_playwright() as p"
occurrence in README.md or examples like stealth_mode.py and replace it with
"async with async_playwright() as p".
- Line 35: Replace the invalid Python import statement "import async" in the
README example with "import asyncio" so the example using asyncio.run(main())
executes; locate the README.md example where "import async" appears and update
it to "import asyncio", and ensure any references to the module in the snippet
(e.g., asyncio.run or asyncio.sleep) match the corrected import.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
I just updated the example of usages.