Skip to content

Conversation

nelsonkopliku
Copy link
Member

Description

This PR Updates the authentication to a token introspection based one.

Did you add the right label?

How was this tested?

Automatic and manual tests.

Did you update the documentation?

In progress

Remember to ask yourself if your PR requires changes to the following documentation:

Add a documentation PR or write that no changes are required for the documentation.

  • DONE

@nelsonkopliku nelsonkopliku self-assigned this Oct 17, 2025
@nelsonkopliku nelsonkopliku added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 17, 2025
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Coverage Status

coverage: 93.697% (-0.07%) from 93.765%
when pulling 705ac83 on token-introspection-auth
into 49cb6f4 on main.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Coverage Status

coverage: 93.697% (-0.07%) from 93.765%
when pulling 705ac83 on token-introspection-auth
into 49cb6f4 on main.

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Oct 17, 2025

Coverage Status

coverage: 93.712% (-0.05%) from 93.765%
when pulling 1287002 on token-introspection-auth
into 49cb6f4 on main.

@nelsonkopliku nelsonkopliku force-pushed the token-introspection-auth branch from 5f16bd3 to 74cd9af Compare October 17, 2025 14:24
@nelsonkopliku nelsonkopliku force-pushed the token-introspection-auth branch from 74cd9af to 042c71b Compare October 17, 2025 14:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants