Stabilize combined publish/subscribe test by using unique channel names #4886
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #4862
Summary
I addressed flakiness in TestPubSub::
test_pubsub_combined_exact_pattern_and_sharded_one_client. The test occasionally reported an off-by-one result (e.g., 767/768). The root cause was key collisions across the randomly generated channel names for Exact, Pattern, and Sharded modes. When collisions occurred, dictionary entries were overwritten, reducing the number of distinct publishes and leading to a mismatched final count.What changed
Exact: "{channel}:{rand}:{i}"
Pattern: "{pattern}:{rand}:{i}"
Sharded: "{same-shard}:{i}:{rand}" (no space after the colon)
This preserves shard grouping via
{same-shard}and eliminates accidental overwrites without relaxing any assertions. The expected message count remainsNUM_CHANNELS * 3.Validation