Skip to content

[world-vercel] Use v3 stream endpoint (supports transparent reconnect on timeout)#2424

Merged
VaguelySerious merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
peter/stream-read-v3
Jun 22, 2026
Merged

[world-vercel] Use v3 stream endpoint (supports transparent reconnect on timeout)#2424
VaguelySerious merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
peter/stream-read-v3

Conversation

@VaguelySerious

@VaguelySerious VaguelySerious commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Needs V3 stream API to be live on the server first.

Point the world-vercel live-stream reader (world.streams.get, used by run.getReadable()) at the v3 stream endpoint instead of v2. Writes, stream completion, and snapshot reads (chunks/info/list) stay on v2 — only the long-lived live read is affected.

Why

On the v3 endpoint the server errors the response body on a max-duration timeout (or a mid-stream connection drop) rather than closing it cleanly. That thrown error is exactly what the reconnecting reader (createReconnectingFramedStream) needs to resume from the next chunk via startIndex. On v2 the server closes cleanly, which the reader treats as end-of-stream — so today long-lived streams silently truncate at the server's 2-minute limit. This change makes object-stream reads (e.g. the AI chat UIMessageChunk stream) transparently survive the timeout.

The reconnecting reader already shipped (#2318 on main, #1847 on stable); it's been inert because the server never errored on timeout. This flips it on.

Point the world-vercel live-stream reader at the v3 stream endpoint. On a
max-duration timeout (or mid-stream connection drop) the v3 server errors
the response body rather than closing it cleanly, which is what lets the
reconnecting reader resume from the next chunk instead of treating the
timeout as end-of-stream. Writes, completion, and snapshot reads stay on v2.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 2fb4892

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 17 packages
Name Type
@workflow/world-vercel Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/web Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 22, 2026 9:56pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 22, 2026 9:56pm
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 22, 2026 9:56pm
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 22, 2026 9:56pm
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 22, 2026 9:56pm
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 22, 2026 9:56pm
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 22, 2026 9:56pm
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 22, 2026 9:56pm
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 22, 2026 9:56pm
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Building Building Preview, Comment Jun 22, 2026 9:56pm
workbench-tanstack-start-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 22, 2026 9:56pm
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 22, 2026 9:56pm
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment, Open in v0 Jun 22, 2026 9:56pm
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 22, 2026 9:56pm
workflow-tarballs Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 22, 2026 9:56pm
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 22, 2026 9:56pm

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.037s (-9.3% 🟢) 1.005s (~) 0.968s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 0.047s (+13.3% 🔺) 1.006s (~) 0.959s 10 1.26x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.048s (~) 1.007s (~) 0.959s 10 1.30x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.061s (-3.2%) 1.012s (~) 0.951s 10 1.65x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.064s (+3.6%) 1.011s (~) 0.947s 10 1.72x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.102s (+76.0% 🔺) 1.055s (+4.3%) 0.953s 10 2.74x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 0.400s (+2.6%) 2.695s (+6.6% 🔺) 2.295s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 0.427s (+32.2% 🔺) 2.730s (-2.1%) 2.303s 10 1.07x
▲ Vercel Express 0.481s (+21.2% 🔺) 2.483s (+1.9%) 2.002s 10 1.20x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.061s (-2.5%) 2.005s (~) 0.944s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 1.085s (-1.4%) 2.006s (~) 0.922s 10 1.02x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.088s (~) 2.007s (~) 0.919s 10 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.089s (-1.3%) 2.009s (~) 0.920s 10 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.099s (~) 2.009s (~) 0.910s 10 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.113s (+1.0%) 2.017s (~) 0.904s 10 1.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.602s (+1.5%) 3.425s (-7.8% 🟢) 1.823s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 1.686s (+10.9% 🔺) 3.523s (-1.3%) 1.836s 10 1.05x
▲ Vercel Nitro 1.909s (+24.0% 🔺) 3.905s (+11.2% 🔺) 1.995s 10 1.19x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 10.342s (-1.6%) 11.021s (~) 0.680s 3 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 10.448s (-0.9%) 11.018s (~) 0.570s 3 1.01x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 10.461s (-0.8%) 11.022s (~) 0.561s 3 1.01x
💻 Local Express 10.473s (~) 11.023s (~) 0.549s 3 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 10.487s (-0.8%) 11.016s (~) 0.529s 3 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Express 10.506s (~) 11.018s (~) 0.512s 3 1.02x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 12.328s (-6.5% 🟢) 14.532s (-5.5% 🟢) 2.203s 3 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 12.462s (-4.8%) 14.149s (-7.0% 🟢) 1.687s 3 1.01x
▲ Vercel Nitro 13.838s (+7.8% 🔺) 15.627s (+2.4%) 1.789s 2 1.12x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 13.331s (-2.6%) 14.026s (~) 0.694s 5 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 13.581s (-1.5%) 14.023s (~) 0.441s 5 1.02x
💻 Local Express 13.637s (-2.6%) 14.028s (-1.4%) 0.390s 5 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 13.649s (-1.9%) 14.023s (~) 0.374s 5 1.02x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 13.709s (~) 14.027s (~) 0.318s 5 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 13.735s (-1.3%) 14.029s (~) 0.294s 5 1.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 18.496s (-14.0% 🟢) 20.085s (-14.5% 🟢) 1.589s 3 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 19.952s (-1.0%) 21.503s (-4.1%) 1.551s 3 1.08x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 20.525s (+2.9%) 22.789s (+2.6%) 2.264s 3 1.11x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 11.882s (-3.3%) 12.146s (-6.8% 🟢) 0.264s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 12.083s (-3.0%) 13.021s (~) 0.938s 7 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 12.158s (-3.0%) 12.652s (-2.8%) 0.494s 8 1.02x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 12.206s (-2.0%) 13.025s (~) 0.818s 7 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 12.219s (-1.5%) 12.876s (-1.1%) 0.656s 7 1.03x
💻 Local Express 12.220s (-3.0%) 13.026s (~) 0.806s 7 1.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 26.136s (+3.9%) 28.365s (+3.3%) 2.229s 4 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 27.298s (+10.4% 🔺) 29.044s (+8.8% 🔺) 1.746s 4 1.04x
▲ Vercel Express 28.159s (+22.3% 🔺) 30.077s (+19.6% 🔺) 1.918s 3 1.08x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.180s (-0.6%) 2.008s (~) 0.827s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.182s (-1.1%) 2.007s (~) 0.825s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.271s (+9.7% 🔺) 2.017s (~) 0.746s 15 1.08x
💻 Local Nitro 1.294s (+7.6% 🔺) 2.005s (~) 0.711s 15 1.10x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.400s (+1.9%) 2.007s (~) 0.606s 15 1.19x
💻 Local Express 1.403s (+14.0% 🔺) 2.007s (~) 0.604s 15 1.19x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 3.391s (+28.1% 🔺) 5.202s (+16.8% 🔺) 1.810s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 3.568s (+32.5% 🔺) 5.572s (+25.0% 🔺) 2.004s 6 1.05x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.857s (+48.8% 🔺) 5.700s (+28.8% 🔺) 1.843s 6 1.14x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.305s (+2.9%) 2.675s (+33.3% 🔺) 1.370s 12 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.330s (+1.7%) 2.736s (+31.9% 🔺) 1.406s 11 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.396s (+11.6% 🔺) 2.514s (+25.3% 🔺) 1.117s 12 1.07x
💻 Local Nitro 2.128s (+5.6% 🔺) 2.674s (+6.7% 🔺) 0.546s 12 1.63x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.471s (+5.4% 🔺) 3.009s (+3.1%) 0.538s 10 1.89x
💻 Local Express 2.497s (+22.7% 🔺) 3.009s (+20.0% 🔺) 0.512s 10 1.91x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 3.737s (+31.8% 🔺) 5.463s (+19.0% 🔺) 1.726s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.203s (+31.9% 🔺) 6.398s (+24.8% 🔺) 2.196s 5 1.12x
▲ Vercel Nitro 4.636s (+86.4% 🔺) 6.426s (+58.3% 🔺) 1.790s 5 1.24x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.593s (-3.9%) 4.011s (+6.6% 🔺) 2.418s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.600s (+10.3% 🔺) 4.013s (+9.1% 🔺) 2.414s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 2.351s (+58.7% 🔺) 4.874s (+25.4% 🔺) 2.523s 7 1.48x
💻 Local Nitro 4.620s (+3.1%) 5.358s (+6.9% 🔺) 0.739s 6 2.90x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 5.480s (-18.1% 🟢) 6.014s (-18.9% 🟢) 0.534s 6 3.44x
💻 Local Express 6.477s (+12.2% 🔺) 7.216s (+12.5% 🔺) 0.739s 5 4.07x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 4.794s (+56.0% 🔺) 6.753s (+37.4% 🔺) 1.959s 5 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 5.676s (+84.7% 🔺) 7.789s (+57.9% 🔺) 2.112s 4 1.18x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 6.409s (+83.0% 🔺) 8.522s (+56.9% 🔺) 2.113s 4 1.34x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.184s (-1.2%) 2.007s (~) 0.823s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.192s (+1.6%) 2.009s (~) 0.817s 15 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.219s (+2.0%) 2.007s (~) 0.788s 15 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 1.346s (+9.5% 🔺) 2.006s (~) 0.660s 15 1.14x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.386s (+2.6%) 2.006s (~) 0.620s 15 1.17x
💻 Local Express 1.480s (+20.3% 🔺) 2.007s (~) 0.527s 15 1.25x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.957s (+36.5% 🔺) 5.113s (+31.9% 🔺) 2.156s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.305s (+54.5% 🔺) 5.515s (+35.9% 🔺) 2.210s 6 1.12x
▲ Vercel Express 3.999s (+97.6% 🔺) 5.716s (+46.4% 🔺) 1.716s 6 1.35x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.359s (+6.6% 🔺) 2.472s (+23.1% 🔺) 1.113s 13 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.389s (+9.9% 🔺) 2.435s (+17.4% 🔺) 1.046s 13 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.417s (+9.5% 🔺) 2.736s (+36.3% 🔺) 1.319s 11 1.04x
💻 Local Nitro 2.270s (+13.0% 🔺) 2.828s (+22.2% 🔺) 0.558s 11 1.67x
💻 Local Express 2.482s (+21.8% 🔺) 3.109s (+13.6% 🔺) 0.626s 10 1.83x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.493s (+3.1%) 3.110s (+6.6% 🔺) 0.616s 10 1.83x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 3.468s (+30.2% 🔺) 5.819s (+39.8% 🔺) 2.351s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 3.869s (+49.9% 🔺) 6.017s (+38.4% 🔺) 2.148s 5 1.12x
▲ Vercel Nitro 4.112s (+50.0% 🔺) 6.135s (+42.8% 🔺) 2.024s 6 1.19x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.590s (+11.1% 🔺) 4.136s (+10.0% 🔺) 2.547s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.608s (+10.4% 🔺) 4.010s (+6.7% 🔺) 2.402s 8 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 2.268s (+54.4% 🔺) 5.180s (+33.3% 🔺) 2.912s 6 1.43x
💻 Local Nitro 5.510s (+11.4% 🔺) 6.017s (+9.1% 🔺) 0.507s 6 3.47x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 6.084s (-10.4% 🟢) 6.613s (-12.0% 🟢) 0.529s 5 3.83x
💻 Local Express 6.752s (+13.2% 🔺) 7.218s (+5.9% 🔺) 0.466s 5 4.25x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 5.223s (+58.0% 🔺) 7.409s (+40.9% 🔺) 2.186s 5 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 5.586s (+31.3% 🔺) 7.456s (+22.4% 🔺) 1.870s 5 1.07x
▲ Vercel Nitro 5.686s (+29.1% 🔺) 7.529s (+14.6% 🔺) 1.843s 4 1.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.473s (-17.1% 🟢) 1.004s (-1.8%) 0.531s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.551s (-2.0%) 1.023s (~) 0.472s 59 1.16x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.553s (-4.0%) 1.040s (+1.6%) 0.487s 58 1.17x
💻 Local Express 0.603s (-1.3%) 1.005s (~) 0.403s 60 1.27x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.609s (~) 1.005s (-1.6%) 0.396s 60 1.29x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.630s (+11.4% 🔺) 1.070s (+4.5%) 0.440s 57 1.33x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 4.229s (+23.3% 🔺) 5.900s (+8.7% 🔺) 1.670s 11 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 4.522s (+50.1% 🔺) 6.247s (+23.8% 🔺) 1.725s 10 1.07x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 5.441s (+31.7% 🔺) 7.377s (+18.2% 🔺) 1.936s 9 1.29x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.161s (-16.1% 🟢) 2.005s (~) 0.844s 45 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.231s (-3.4%) 2.007s (~) 0.776s 45 1.06x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.283s (-3.2%) 2.007s (~) 0.724s 45 1.10x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.431s (+12.2% 🔺) 2.015s (~) 0.584s 45 1.23x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.487s (+0.8%) 2.006s (~) 0.519s 45 1.28x
💻 Local Express 1.525s (-2.1%) 2.028s (~) 0.503s 45 1.31x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 12.451s (+63.2% 🔺) 14.523s (+52.9% 🔺) 2.073s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 12.796s (+49.2% 🔺) 15.231s (+46.1% 🔺) 2.436s 6 1.03x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 13.932s (+70.2% 🔺) 16.019s (+60.2% 🔺) 2.087s 6 1.12x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 2.513s (-5.3% 🟢) 3.059s (-2.5%) 0.546s 40 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.541s (-3.6%) 3.111s (+1.7%) 0.571s 39 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 2.620s (-12.6% 🟢) 3.032s (-11.8% 🟢) 0.412s 40 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.087s (+21.1% 🔺) 3.608s (+19.9% 🔺) 0.521s 34 1.23x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 3.262s (+1.8%) 4.010s (+0.8%) 0.747s 30 1.30x
💻 Local Express 3.355s (+3.2%) 4.009s (~) 0.654s 30 1.34x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 24.459s (+62.6% 🔺) 26.616s (+54.6% 🔺) 2.158s 5 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 26.442s (+63.2% 🔺) 29.107s (+58.1% 🔺) 2.665s 5 1.08x
▲ Vercel Nitro 28.562s (+71.1% 🔺) 30.287s (+59.1% 🔺) 1.725s 4 1.17x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 0.210s (-4.0%) 1.006s (~) 0.796s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.223s (+5.4% 🔺) 1.006s (~) 0.783s 60 1.06x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.240s (+33.9% 🔺) 1.013s (+0.6%) 0.773s 60 1.14x
💻 Local Nitro 0.376s (+11.3% 🔺) 1.003s (~) 0.628s 60 1.79x
💻 Local Express 0.472s (+38.3% 🔺) 1.005s (~) 0.533s 60 2.24x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.641s (+5.8% 🔺) 1.022s (+1.7%) 0.381s 59 3.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.331s (+70.5% 🔺) 4.485s (+43.8% 🔺) 2.154s 14 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.526s (+91.9% 🔺) 4.600s (+54.6% 🔺) 2.073s 14 1.08x
▲ Vercel Express 2.529s (+99.9% 🔺) 4.421s (+49.5% 🔺) 1.892s 14 1.08x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 0.325s (+1.2%) 1.006s (~) 0.681s 90 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.331s (+2.6%) 1.018s (+1.1%) 0.686s 89 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.451s (+68.0% 🔺) 1.047s (+4.0%) 0.596s 87 1.39x
💻 Local Nitro 1.775s (-12.4% 🟢) 2.286s (-7.4% 🟢) 0.511s 40 5.47x
💻 Local Express 2.158s (+10.3% 🔺) 2.767s (+12.1% 🔺) 0.609s 33 6.65x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.817s (+5.7% 🔺) 3.342s (+8.7% 🔺) 0.525s 27 8.68x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.957s (+74.3% 🔺) 4.772s (+35.0% 🔺) 1.815s 19 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 3.336s (+96.8% 🔺) 5.172s (+44.1% 🔺) 1.835s 18 1.13x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.664s (+63.4% 🔺) 6.046s (+44.4% 🔺) 2.382s 15 1.24x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 0.508s (+3.1%) 1.049s (+3.5%) 0.541s 115 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.523s (~) 1.086s (+3.5%) 0.563s 113 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.593s (+23.0% 🔺) 2.357s (-22.3% 🟢) 1.764s 51 1.17x
💻 Local Nitro 8.004s (-14.5% 🟢) 8.880s (-12.2% 🟢) 0.876s 14 15.74x
💻 Local Express 9.862s (+0.8%) 10.938s (+3.1%) 1.076s 11 19.40x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 10.970s (+9.0% 🔺) 11.847s (+6.6% 🔺) 0.877s 11 21.58x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 4.093s (+85.8% 🔺) 6.365s (+54.9% 🔺) 2.272s 19 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 4.210s (+73.6% 🔺) 6.093s (+39.3% 🔺) 1.883s 20 1.03x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 5.724s (+61.5% 🔺) 8.191s (+51.2% 🔺) 2.467s 15 1.40x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.120s (-2.5%) 2.004s (~) 0.008s (-10.9% 🟢) 2.015s (~) 0.894s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.142s (-1.0%) 1.968s (-1.7%) 0.013s (+0.8%) 2.020s (~) 0.878s 10 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.147s (-1.9%) 2.000s (~) 0.001s (-42.1% 🟢) 2.009s (~) 0.862s 10 1.02x
💻 Local Express 1.162s (-1.1%) 2.005s (~) 0.012s (-2.4%) 2.020s (~) 0.858s 10 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.169s (-0.8%) 1.996s (~) 0.002s (+14.3% 🔺) 2.011s (~) 0.841s 10 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.213s (+3.7%) 1.998s (~) 0.001s (-41.7% 🟢) 2.012s (~) 0.799s 10 1.08x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.272s (+7.7% 🔺) 3.567s (+5.4% 🔺) 3.844s (+131.6% 🔺) 8.056s (+45.4% 🔺) 5.784s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 2.491s (+15.6% 🔺) 3.856s (+13.0% 🔺) 3.589s (+125.5% 🔺) 8.059s (+44.4% 🔺) 5.568s 10 1.10x
▲ Vercel Express 2.579s (+14.2% 🔺) 3.395s (~) 3.983s (+47.1% 🔺) 8.030s (+17.8% 🔺) 5.451s 10 1.14x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.423s (-9.8% 🟢) 2.006s (~) 0.010s (-14.6% 🟢) 2.019s (~) 0.596s 30 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.531s (-3.4%) 2.002s (~) 0.005s (-4.0%) 2.025s (~) 0.494s 30 1.08x
💻 Local Express 1.538s (-2.9%) 2.010s (~) 0.011s (-7.3% 🟢) 2.025s (~) 0.487s 30 1.08x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.579s (-3.8%) 2.002s (-1.8%) 0.005s (+8.1% 🔺) 2.026s (-1.6%) 0.447s 30 1.11x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.582s (-2.2%) 1.968s (-2.0%) 0.013s (+6.0% 🔺) 2.027s (~) 0.444s 30 1.11x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.936s (+21.0% 🔺) 2.315s (+15.2% 🔺) 0.004s (-12.7% 🟢) 2.332s (+15.2% 🔺) 0.396s 26 1.36x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 6.465s (+5.4% 🔺) 7.743s (-1.3%) 0.488s (+71.9% 🔺) 8.748s (+0.9%) 2.283s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 6.996s (+17.8% 🔺) 8.246s (+8.5% 🔺) 0.515s (+56.0% 🔺) 9.540s (+12.7% 🔺) 2.543s 7 1.08x
▲ Vercel Nitro 7.088s (+23.9% 🔺) 8.418s (+11.1% 🔺) 0.251s (-19.0% 🟢) 9.184s (+9.0% 🔺) 2.095s 7 1.10x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.750s (-2.4%) 1.008s (-8.7% 🟢) 0.000s (+57.9% 🔺) 1.055s (-5.7% 🟢) 0.305s 57 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.778s (+1.8%) 1.029s (-3.3%) 0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺) 1.062s (-1.6%) 0.284s 57 1.04x
💻 Local Nitro 1.070s (-21.6% 🟢) 1.660s (-17.5% 🟢) 0.000s (-25.7% 🟢) 1.662s (-17.5% 🟢) 0.592s 37 1.43x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.167s (+53.3% 🔺) 1.575s (+44.8% 🔺) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 1.600s (+46.0% 🔺) 0.433s 38 1.56x
💻 Local Express 1.230s (-7.0% 🟢) 2.013s (~) 0.001s (+81.8% 🔺) 2.016s (~) 0.786s 30 1.64x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.357s (-6.3% 🟢) 1.980s (-1.6%) 0.000s (-44.4% 🟢) 2.016s (~) 0.659s 30 1.81x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 4.255s (+26.0% 🔺) 5.705s (+13.1% 🔺) 0.000s (-45.0% 🟢) 6.211s (+11.6% 🔺) 1.956s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 4.562s (-4.0%) 5.681s (-13.8% 🟢) 0.001s (+Infinity% 🔺) 6.231s (-12.5% 🟢) 1.669s 10 1.07x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.687s (+10.8% 🔺) 6.342s (+2.1%) 0.002s (+11.8% 🔺) 6.955s (+2.1%) 2.268s 9 1.10x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.623s (+6.1% 🔺) 2.253s (+7.2% 🔺) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 2.296s (+6.7% 🔺) 0.673s 27 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.821s (+10.0% 🔺) 2.302s (+4.0%) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 2.317s (+3.9%) 0.495s 26 1.12x
💻 Local Nitro 2.806s (-19.8% 🟢) 3.386s (-14.5% 🟢) 0.001s (-53.2% 🟢) 3.396s (-14.5% 🟢) 0.589s 19 1.73x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.492s (+83.0% 🔺) 3.760s (+47.8% 🔺) 0.000s (NaN%) 3.818s (+49.7% 🔺) 0.326s 16 2.15x
💻 Local Express 3.639s (~) 4.293s (+1.6%) 0.001s (+40.0% 🔺) 4.297s (+1.6%) 0.658s 15 2.24x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 4.145s (+0.6%) 4.631s (+0.7%) 0.001s (-22.2% 🟢) 4.679s (+1.5%) 0.534s 14 2.55x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 6.682s (+17.4% 🔺) 8.002s (+12.1% 🔺) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 8.560s (+10.9% 🔺) 1.878s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 6.920s (-16.2% 🟢) 8.000s (-19.0% 🟢) 0.000s (-62.5% 🟢) 8.500s (-18.6% 🟢) 1.579s 8 1.04x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 7.602s (+43.6% 🔺) 9.925s (+46.2% 🔺) 0.000s (NaN%) 10.503s (+43.5% 🔺) 2.901s 6 1.14x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Nitro 21/21
🐘 Postgres Nitro 12/21
▲ Vercel Nitro 9/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 🐘 Postgres 17/21
Next.js (Turbopack) 🐘 Postgres 14/21
Nitro 🐘 Postgres 12/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Platformatic: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 1442 0 230 1672
✅ 💻 Local Development 1605 0 219 1824
✅ 📦 Local Production 1605 0 219 1824
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 1593 0 231 1824
✅ 🪟 Windows 152 0 0 152
✅ 📋 Other 885 0 179 1064
Total 7282 0 1078 8360

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro 125 0 27
✅ example 125 0 27
✅ express 125 0 27
✅ fastify 125 0 27
✅ hono 125 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack 149 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack 149 0 3
✅ nitro 125 0 27
✅ nuxt 125 0 27
✅ sveltekit 144 0 8
✅ vite 125 0 27
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 127 0 25
✅ express-stable 127 0 25
✅ fastify-stable 127 0 25
✅ hono-stable 127 0 25
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 133 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 152 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 133 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 152 0 0
✅ nitro-stable 127 0 25
✅ nuxt-stable 127 0 25
✅ sveltekit-stable 146 0 6
✅ vite-stable 127 0 25
✅ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 127 0 25
✅ express-stable 127 0 25
✅ fastify-stable 127 0 25
✅ hono-stable 127 0 25
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 133 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 152 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 133 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 152 0 0
✅ nitro-stable 127 0 25
✅ nuxt-stable 127 0 25
✅ sveltekit-stable 146 0 6
✅ vite-stable 127 0 25
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 126 0 26
✅ express-stable 126 0 26
✅ fastify-stable 126 0 26
✅ hono-stable 126 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 132 0 20
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 151 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 132 0 20
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 151 0 1
✅ nitro-stable 126 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable 126 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable 145 0 7
✅ vite-stable 126 0 26
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 152 0 0
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 127 0 25
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start- 127 0 25
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 126 0 26
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start- 126 0 26
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 127 0 25
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start- 127 0 25
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start 125 0 27

📋 View full workflow run

@VaguelySerious VaguelySerious marked this pull request as ready for review June 15, 2026 13:05
@VaguelySerious VaguelySerious requested a review from a team as a code owner June 15, 2026 13:05
Comment thread .changeset/stream-read-v3-reconnect.md Outdated
Signed-off-by: Peter Wielander <mittgfu@gmail.com>

@karthikscale3 karthikscale3 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed for blockers and regressions. I did not find any issues.

// (chunks/info/list) stay on v2.
function getStreamReadUrl(name: string, runId: string, httpConfig: HttpConfig) {
return new URL(
`${httpConfig.baseUrl}/v3/runs/${encodeURIComponent(runId)}/stream/${encodeURIComponent(name)}`

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Review: Verified that only live stream reads move to the v3 endpoint while writes, close, and snapshot reads stay on v2, preserving existing write semantics while enabling reconnect-on-timeout behavior.

@VaguelySerious VaguelySerious requested a review from ijjk as a code owner June 22, 2026 21:51
@VaguelySerious VaguelySerious merged commit d476d7a into main Jun 22, 2026
113 checks passed
@VaguelySerious VaguelySerious deleted the peter/stream-read-v3 branch June 22, 2026 22:18
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport to stable failed — the cherry-pick had conflicts that could not be resolved automatically (backport job run).

To resolve manually, push a backport branch and open a PR against stable (the workflow never pushes directly to stable). Note: this repository requires verified signatures on every branch, so your local commits must be signed (git config commit.gpgsign true with a configured GPG/SSH signing key, or git cherry-pick -S).

git fetch origin stable
git checkout -b backport/pr-2424-to-stable origin/stable
git cherry-pick -S d476d7aaf6fd58d5d7241d2152fb7a705a27c4e4    # -S signs the commit
# Fix conflicts, then:
git add -A
git cherry-pick --continue
git push -u origin backport/pr-2424-to-stable
gh pr create --base stable --head backport/pr-2424-to-stable \
  --title "Backport #2424: <original PR title>" \
  --body "Manual backport of #2424 (cherry-pick d476d7aaf6fd) to \`stable\`."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants