T7157: bgp: Added verification of the route-map existence in vrf import

[aapostoliuk]

Change summary

Added verification of the route-map existence in the vrf route-leaking.

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Code style update (formatting, renaming)
• Refactoring (no functional changes)
• Migration from an old Vyatta component to vyos-1x, please link to related PR inside obsoleted component
• Other (please describe):

Related Task(s)

• https://vyos.dev/T7157

Related PR(s)

How to test / Smoketest result

Smoketests:

vyos@vyos:~$ /usr/libexec/vyos/tests/smoke/cli/test_protocols_bgp.py
test_bgp_01_simple (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_01_simple) ... ok
test_bgp_02_neighbors (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_02_neighbors) ... ok
test_bgp_03_peer_groups (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_03_peer_groups) ... ok
test_bgp_04_afi_ipv4 (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_04_afi_ipv4) ... ok
test_bgp_05_afi_ipv6 (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_05_afi_ipv6) ... ok
test_bgp_06_listen_range (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_06_listen_range) ... ok
test_bgp_07_l2vpn_evpn (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_07_l2vpn_evpn) ... ok
test_bgp_09_distance_and_flowspec (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_09_distance_and_flowspec) ... ok
test_bgp_10_vrf_simple (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_10_vrf_simple) ... ok
test_bgp_11_confederation (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_11_confederation) ... ok
test_bgp_12_v6_link_local (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_12_v6_link_local) ... ok
test_bgp_13_vpn (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_13_vpn) ... ok
test_bgp_14_remote_as_peer_group_override (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_14_remote_as_peer_group_override) ... ok
test_bgp_15_local_as_ebgp (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_15_local_as_ebgp) ... ok
test_bgp_16_import_rd_rt_compatibility (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_16_import_rd_rt_compatibility) ... ok
test_bgp_17_import_rd_rt_compatibility (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_17_import_rd_rt_compatibility) ... ok
test_bgp_18_deleting_import_vrf (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_18_deleting_import_vrf) ... ok
test_bgp_19_deleting_default_vrf (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_19_deleting_default_vrf) ... ok
test_bgp_20_import_rd_rt_compatibility (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_20_import_rd_rt_compatibility) ... ok
test_bgp_21_import_unspecified_vrf (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_21_import_unspecified_vrf) ... ok
test_bgp_22_interface_mpls_forwarding (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_22_interface_mpls_forwarding) ... ok
test_bgp_23_vrf_interface_mpls_forwarding (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_23_vrf_interface_mpls_forwarding) ... ok
test_bgp_24_srv6_sid (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_24_srv6_sid) ... ok
test_bgp_25_ipv4_labeled_unicast_peer_group (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_25_ipv4_labeled_unicast_peer_group) ... ok
test_bgp_26_ipv6_labeled_unicast_peer_group (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_26_ipv6_labeled_unicast_peer_group) ... ok
test_bgp_27_route_reflector_client (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_27_route_reflector_client) ... ok
test_bgp_28_peer_group_member_all_internal_or_external (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_28_peer_group_member_all_internal_or_external) ... ok
test_bgp_29_peer_group_remote_as_equal_local_as (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_29_peer_group_remote_as_equal_local_as) ... ok
test_bgp_30_import_vrf_routemap (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_30_import_vrf_routemap) ... ok
test_bgp_99_bmp (__main__.TestProtocolsBGP.test_bgp_99_bmp) ... ok

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 30 tests in 420.263s

OK

Checklist:

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
• I have linked this PR to one or more Phabricator Task(s)
• I have run the components SMOKETESTS if applicable
• My commit headlines contain a valid Task id
• My change requires a change to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation accordingly

[github-actions]

👍
No issues in PR Title / Commit Title

[c-po]

Added missing check for route-map existence.

[c-po]

@aapostoliuk do we need backports for circinus/sagitta? If se please add the labels

[github-actions]

CI integration 👍 passed!

Details

CI logs

• CLI Smoketests (no interfaces) 👍 passed
• CLI Smoketests (interfaces only) 👍 passed
• Config tests 👍 passed
• RAID1 tests 👍 passed
• TPM tests 👍 passed

[dmbaturin]

We should certainly verify that the user isn't trying to assign a non-existent route-map, for VRF route leaking or anywhere. The original option was backported to Sagitta so this will also need backports.