Skip to content

EX-13898: Add support for Lustre Quota Aggregation (LQA)#149

Open
yangx-jy wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
xyang/EX-13898
Open

EX-13898: Add support for Lustre Quota Aggregation (LQA)#149
yangx-jy wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
xyang/EX-13898

Conversation

@yangx-jy

@yangx-jy yangx-jy commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.61%. Comparing base (b133c34) to head (3f6b88a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #149      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.57%   94.61%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          46       46              
  Lines        6107     6150      +43     
  Branches     6107     6150      +43     
==========================================
+ Hits         5776     5819      +43     
  Misses        256      256              
  Partials       75       75              
Flag Coverage Δ
2_14_0_ddn133 35.79% <82.69%> (+0.15%) ⬆️
2_14_0_ddn145 37.56% <82.69%> (+0.15%) ⬆️
all-tests 94.61% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchxyang/EX-13898
Testbedci-runner
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
jobstats 100📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1.51 ms
(+2.18%)Baseline: 1.48 ms
1.32 ms
(87.21%)
1.64 ms
(92.15%)
jobstats 1000📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
14.53 ms
(+1.51%)Baseline: 14.32 ms
12.76 ms
(87.82%)
15.87 ms
(91.57%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchxyang/EX-13898
Testbedci-runner

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds flag.

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkD1 Miss Ratemisses (%)D1mrmisses (reads) x 1e3D1mwmisses (writes) x 1e3DLmrmisses (reads)DLmwmisses (writes) x 1e3Drreads x 1e6Dwwrites x 1e6Estimated Cyclescycles x 1e6I1 Miss Ratemisses (%)I1mrmisses (reads) x 1e3ILmrmisses (reads)InstructionsBenchmark Result
instructions x 1e6
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
instructions x 1e6
(Limit %)
Upper Boundary
instructions x 1e6
(Limit %)
L1 Hit Ratehits (%)L1 Hitshits x 1e6LL Hit Ratehits (%)LL Hitshits x 1e3LL Miss Ratemisses (%)LLd Miss Ratemisses (%)LLi Miss Ratemisses (%)RAM Hit Ratehits (%)RAM Hitshits x 1e3Total read+writereads/writes x 1e6
lustre_metrics::memory_benches::bench_encode_lustre_metrics with_setup:generate_records()📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.92 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
25.30 reads x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
9.06 writes x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
123.00 reads📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
6.39 writes x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
2.48 x 1e6📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
1.24 x 1e6📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
14.86 x 1e6📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.01 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
1.07 reads x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
920.00 reads📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
10.77 x 1e6
(-19.35%)Baseline: 13.35 x 1e6
2.43 x 1e6
(22.52%)
24.28 x 1e6
(44.36%)
📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
99.76 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
14.46 x 1e6📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.19 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
28.00 x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.05 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.17 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.01 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.05 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
7.43 x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
14.49 x 1e6
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchxyang/EX-13898
Testbedci-runner

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds flag.

Click to view all benchmark results
Benchmarkavg_runtime_rss_mibMeasure (MiB)avg_runtime_virtual_mibMeasure (MiB)end_rss_mibMeasure (MiB)end_virtual_mibMeasure (MiB)memory_growth_mibMeasure (MiB)peak_over_start_rss_ratioMeasure (units)peak_over_start_virtual_ratioMeasure (units)peak_rss_mibBenchmark Result
Measure (MiB)
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
Measure (MiB)
(Limit %)
Upper Boundary
Measure (MiB)
(Limit %)
peak_virtual_mibMeasure (MiB)start_rss_mibMeasure (MiB)start_virtual_mibMeasure (MiB)virtual_growth_mibMeasure (MiB)
scrape_allocations📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
41.25 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
878.55 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
41.31 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
878.64 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.31 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
1.03 units📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
1.02 units📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
42.85 MiB
(-44.56%)Baseline: 77.29 MiB
-134.45 MiB
(-313.78%)
289.03 MiB
(14.82%)
📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
878.88 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
41.00 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
873.29 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
5.35 MiB
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <xyang@ddn.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants