add allowNTLMCredentialsForDomains option to enterprise config file

[sliezz]

This PR add an ability to system administrators of configuring NTLM Credentials for domains without recompiling Zulip Desktop сlient app.

There is an Electron demand to implicity configure a list of servers for which integrated authentication is enabled.
Electon docs

In fact It useful only in an Enterprise environments I think we should configure it in appropriate config file

Fixes:

• add option allowNTLMCredentialsForDomains to "Zulip-Desktop-Config/global_config.json"
• on app init it checks up server list and send it to Electron

Platforms this PR was tested on:

• Windows
• macOS
• Linux (Ubuntu)

Self-review checklist

• Self-reviewed the changes for clarity and maintainability
  (variable names, code reuse, readability, etc.).

Communicate decisions, questions, and potential concerns.

• Explains differences from previous plans (e.g., issue description).
• Highlights technical choices and bugs encountered.
• Calls out remaining decisions and concerns.
• Automated tests verify logic where appropriate.

Individual commits are ready for review (see commit discipline).

• Each commit is a coherent idea.
• Commit message(s) explain reasoning and motivation for changes.

Completed manual review and testing of the following:

• Visual appearance of the changes.
• Responsiveness and internationalization.
• Strings and tooltips.
• End-to-end functionality of buttons, interactions and flows.
• Corner cases, error conditions, and easily imagined bugs.

[zulipbot]

Heads up @sliezz, we just merged some commits that conflict with the changes you made in this pull request! You can review this repository's recent commits to see where the conflicts occur. Please rebase your feature branch against the upstream/main branch and resolve your pull request's merge conflicts accordingly.

[sliezz]

Are there any reason to spend my time on this?
Seems nobody here has no intentions to merge even so simple feature into the Project.
Am I wrong?

[timabbott]

Generally review attention across the Zulip project is spent on PRs that are well-presented and follow our contributing guidelines. It'd be great if someone had had the time to reply pointing you to that documentation when you first opened your PR.

Even "simple" features require care - what is the right name for the setting? How can we document it so that end users can understand the decision for what it does, and know what formats are valid for the domains? Etc.

That doesn't mean it can't be picked up and finished by maintainers. We certainly appreciate your submitting the PR! But PRs where there's still a good amount of expert work required to finish them tend to wait a lot longer, especially in this repository.