draft to start updating to CMIP7 data for CTSM5.4#3083
draft to start updating to CMIP7 data for CTSM5.4#3083ekluzek merged 149 commits intoESCOMP:alpha-ctsm5.4.CMIP7from
Conversation
ctsm5.3.039: Create driver data structure for SP mode
Create driver data structure for SP mode
ctsm5.3.040: Update ctsm_pylib to 3.13.2
olyson
left a comment
olyson
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks ok to me. See my comment about line 254
ekluzek
added
enhancement
github-project-automation
bot
moved this to Status not assigned
in CTSM: release-ctsm5.4 minor version update (CMIP7 datasets)
ekluzek
left a comment
ekluzek
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is our starting point for being able to make ctsm5.4 datasets.
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from Status not assigned
to Done
in CTSM: release-ctsm5.4 minor version update (CMIP7 datasets)
|
I think something went wrong with the PCT_URBAN part of the surface dataset generation for /glade/derecho/scratch/wwieder/mksrf_5.4/surfdata_0.9x1.25_hist_1850_78pfts_c250423.nc. I'm looking into it. |
|
The mksrf_furban_mesh in the namelist needs to be changed from /glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/inputdata/lnd/clm2/mappingdata/grids/UNSTRUCTgrid_3x3min_nomask_cdf5_c200129.nc to /glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/inputdata/lnd/clm2/mappingdata/grids/UNSTRUCTgrid_0.25x0.25_nomask_cdf5_c200129.nc The GaoOneill data was at 3x3min, but the CMIP7 data is at 0.25x0.25. When you regenerate the 1850 dataset can you generate a landuse timeseries as well? I'd like to look at the transient urban before we commit to doing spinup simulations with the 1850 dataset. |
|
The new 1850 surface dataset and landuse timeseries (1850-2023) that you generated (#3089 (review)) look reasonable with respect to urban. I would like to make one change however, that is, eliminate the TBD class prior to 1900. Even though the percentages are very small, that type really shouldn't exist prior to 1900 as the first skyscrapers weren't built until the 1880s. So I will generate a new set of raw urban files and then we can re-create the datasets, perhaps after Peter has a look at the datasets also...? |
|
Sounds good. Let me know when it's ready |
I've made the change to TBD and generated a new set of raw urban files, looks good. They are in the same location with a date of 250423, e.g., /glade/campaign/cgd/tss/people/oleson/Dynamic_Urban_Data/CMIP7/urban_properties_CMIP7_ThreeClass_2023_c250423.nc |
6 participants
Description of changes
updating to latest LULCC and urban data for CMIP7
Specific notes
Data processed by @lawrencepj1 and @olyson
Fixes ##2851
purpose here is just to make ne30 and f09 grids to evaluate the new surface datasets before updating gen_mksurfdata_namelist.xml and creating the 'final' CTSM5.4 datasets