ctsm5.4.024: Hot fix with updated derecho_intel and one line fix needed for it#3796
ctsm5.4.024: Hot fix with updated derecho_intel and one line fix needed for it#3796ekluzek wants to merge 10 commits intoESCOMP:masterfrom
Conversation
… and clarify the strings with a concatenation so it's more clear and there's the needed space between the and and the namelist option name do_transient_urban
|
This is on top of #3786 so that needs to come to master first to show the true differences. |
|
There were 73 tests on Derecho with changed answers, which isn't surprising since this was a compiler update: And there are seven unexpected fails that I need to look into: |
|
The first two fails are an error in the SparseMatrixMultiply for CN matrix with errors that look like this: cesm.log: For these tests: |
|
The five mpi-serial tests that fail: Do so because of a divide by zero that looks like this: |
…he namelist move for ESCOMP#3391 the move_nml_parameters branch
…he paramfile" Temporarily revert the change to fix the coupled model parameter file, so that it comes in on an answer changing tag. This reverts commit 580708d.
…-issues' into ccs_config_1077_derecho_intel_needed_updates
|
@slevis-lmwg and I discussing this. On the CN fails. In #3360 we note that resubmitted enabled the test to pass. So I'll do the same here. Also there is a matrixcn testlist and I should run it, to check more CN matrix tests. Actually looking again it looks like all the matrixcn tests are in aux_clm. Maybe we should delete the matrixcn testlist then? Actually let's keep it because the list is 50 tests and this makes it easier to run just that set of things. |
Description of changes
Update to ccs_config1.0.77 with derecho_intel updates to intel/2024.3.2. And a one line fix so that it will build.
Also fix so that when coupled to CAM we get the clm6_0_cam7.0 parameter file.
Specific notes
Contributors other than yourself, if any: @jedwards4b
CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Fixes #3791
Fixes #3795
Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? Yes, some
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No
Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? No No
Testing performed, if any: will run regular
So far ran:
SMS.f45_f45_mg37.I2000Clm60FatesSpRsGs.derecho_nvhpc.clm-FatesColdSatPhen
SMS_D.f10_f10_mg37.I1850Clm60BgcCrop.derecho_intel.clm-ciso_soil_matrixcn_only
ERS_D_Ld5.f45_f45_mg37.I2000Clm60Fates.derecho_intel.clm-FatesColdCamLndTuningMode
which all pass and compare identically to the ctsm5.4.022 baseline