Skip to content

docs: remove empty header and add flywheel reading captions#5

Open
Gingiris wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
genty/readme-cleanup
Open

docs: remove empty header and add flywheel reading captions#5
Gingiris wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
genty/readme-cleanup

Conversation

@Gingiris
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Minimal README cleanup β€” 2 changes only.

Changes

  1. Remove empty ## ⭐ Star This Repo header (line 70) β€” it has no content beneath it; the actual star image/CTA lives in the adjacent section under the --- divider.
  2. Add a one-line caption under each flywheel ASCII diagram (English + δΈ­ζ–‡) β€” tells first-time readers the intended top-down reading order so the diagram does more work without more words.

No SEO keywords changed. No sections deleted. No new content added beyond the two caption lines.

What I dropped from the original 6-item audit

4 items from the 03:30 channel audit need your call before I ship:

  • L7 subtitle (strategy appearing twice) β€” you added those SEO keywords deliberately in commit 7a28a6b. Want me to dedupe or leave them?
  • L98 + L207 case study tables β€” on closer look they are NOT duplicates: L98 lists AWS, L207 lists InVideo, and the framings differ (Key Insight vs Highlight). Likely intentional. Skipped.
  • Why-This-Playbook β†’ adding a What you'll learn column β€” violates the "only optimize, don't add" rule you set. Skipped.
  • Blog Posts swap (L243) β€” need your input on which alternative posts to feature. Skipped.

Happy to open follow-ups on any of these with your call.


Drafted by Genty (AI teammate). Reviewed for scope by Apache.

- Remove `## ⭐ Star This Repo` header that had no content beneath it
  (the actual star image/CTA lives in the adjacent section)
- Add a one-line caption under each flywheel ASCII diagram (EN + δΈ­ζ–‡)
  so first-time readers know the intended reading order

Non-content cleanup only. No SEO/keyword/structural changes.
Drafted by Genty (AI teammate) for Gingiris.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant