feat: Modernize project with UV backend, enhanced MCP integration, and Windows-optimized setup #693
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,178 @@ | ||
| # Browser Use Web UI - Enhancement Plan Overview | ||
|
|
||
| **Date:** 2025-10-21 | ||
| **Status:** Planning Phase | ||
|
||
| **Priority:** High | ||
|
|
||
| ## Executive Summary | ||
|
|
||
| This document outlines a comprehensive enhancement plan to transform Browser Use Web UI from a basic Gradio interface into a **professional-grade browser automation platform** competitive with Skyvern, MultiOn, and commercial alternatives. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Current State Analysis | ||
|
|
||
| ### Strengths | ||
| - ✅ Multi-LLM support (15+ providers) | ||
| - ✅ Custom browser integration | ||
| - ✅ UV backend with Python 3.14t | ||
| - ✅ MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration | ||
| - ✅ Persistent browser sessions | ||
| - ✅ Modular architecture | ||
|
|
||
| ### Weaknesses | ||
| - ❌ Limited UI/UX - basic Gradio chat interface | ||
| - ❌ No real-time streaming (batch updates only) | ||
| - ❌ No workflow visualization | ||
| - ❌ Limited session management (lost on refresh) | ||
| - ❌ No debugging/observability tools | ||
| - ❌ No template/workflow reusability | ||
| - ❌ No collaborative features | ||
|
|
||
| ## Competitive Landscape | ||
|
|
||
| ### Direct Competitors | ||
|
|
||
| | Tool | Strengths | Weaknesses | Our Opportunity | | ||
| |------|-----------|------------|-----------------| | ||
| | **Skyvern** | Computer vision, high accuracy (85.8%), action recorder | No multi-LLM, no workflow builder, expensive | Better UX, workflow builder, open-source | | ||
| | **MultiOn** | Natural language, Chrome extension | Proprietary, limited customization | Full control, self-hosted | | ||
| | **Playwright MCP** | Deep integration, reliable | Code-heavy, no UI | No-code interface | | ||
| | **LangGraph Studio** | Excellent debugging, traces | Not browser-focused | Browser-specific features | | ||
| | **n8n** | 4000+ templates, visual workflows | Generic automation, not AI-native | AI-first, browser-native | | ||
|
|
||
| ### Market Positioning | ||
|
|
||
| **Target Position:** "The LangGraph Studio for Browser Automation" | ||
| - Visual, intuitive, professional | ||
| - AI-native with multi-LLM support | ||
| - Developer-friendly with observability | ||
| - Community-driven with templates | ||
|
|
||
| ## Strategic Objectives | ||
|
|
||
| ### Phase 1: Foundation (Weeks 1-2) | ||
| **Goal:** Improve core UX to retain users | ||
| - Real-time streaming interface | ||
| - Enhanced status visualization | ||
| - Better chat components | ||
|
|
||
| ### Phase 2: Differentiation (Weeks 3-6) | ||
| **Goal:** Build unique features competitors lack | ||
| - Visual workflow builder (React Flow) | ||
| - Record & replay system | ||
| - Template marketplace | ||
| - Session management | ||
|
|
||
| ### Phase 3: Professional Tools (Weeks 7-12) | ||
| **Goal:** Become the pro tool of choice | ||
| - Observability dashboard | ||
| - Step-by-step debugger | ||
| - Multi-agent orchestration | ||
| - Data extraction tools | ||
|
|
||
| ### Phase 4: Scale (Weeks 13-20) | ||
| **Goal:** Enterprise readiness | ||
| - Event-driven architecture | ||
| - Plugin system | ||
| - Collaborative features | ||
| - Scheduled execution | ||
|
|
||
| ### Phase 5: Polish (Weeks 21-23) | ||
| **Goal:** Production-grade quality | ||
| - UI/UX refinements | ||
| - Performance optimization | ||
| - Documentation | ||
| - Marketing assets | ||
|
|
||
| ## Success Metrics | ||
|
|
||
| ### User Engagement | ||
| - **Session duration:** 5min → 20min average | ||
| - **Return rate:** 30% → 70% weekly | ||
| - **Task completion:** 60% → 85% | ||
|
|
||
| ### Feature Adoption | ||
| - **Template usage:** 50% of runs use templates | ||
| - **Workflow builder:** 30% create visual workflows | ||
| - **Record & replay:** 40% record at least once | ||
|
|
||
| ### Technical Performance | ||
| - **Real-time latency:** <100ms for UI updates | ||
| - **Concurrent users:** Support 100+ simultaneous | ||
| - **Uptime:** 99.5%+ | ||
|
|
||
| ### Community Growth | ||
| - **GitHub stars:** 100 → 1000 (6 months) | ||
| - **Contributors:** 1 → 20 | ||
| - **Discord members:** 0 → 500 | ||
|
|
||
| ## Resource Requirements | ||
|
|
||
| ### Development | ||
| - **Full-time:** 1 senior engineer (6 months) | ||
| - **Part-time:** 1 UI/UX designer (2 months) | ||
| - **Part-time:** 1 DevOps (1 month) | ||
|
|
||
| ### Infrastructure | ||
| - **Staging environment:** $50/month | ||
| - **Production:** $200/month (scaling) | ||
| - **CI/CD:** GitHub Actions (free tier) | ||
|
|
||
| ### External Dependencies | ||
| - React Flow Pro (optional): $299/year | ||
| - LangSmith (monitoring): $49/month | ||
| - Cloud hosting: AWS/Vercel/Railway | ||
|
|
||
| ## Risk Assessment | ||
|
|
||
| ### Technical Risks | ||
| | Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation | | ||
| |------|------------|--------|------------| | ||
| | Gradio limitations | Medium | High | Gradio + React hybrid approach | | ||
| | Performance issues | Medium | Medium | Incremental optimization, profiling | | ||
| | Browser compatibility | Low | Medium | Playwright handles this | | ||
| | LLM API changes | High | Low | Provider abstraction already exists | | ||
|
|
||
| ### Business Risks | ||
| | Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation | | ||
| |------|------------|--------|------------| | ||
| | Competitor releases similar features | Medium | Medium | Fast iteration, open-source advantage | | ||
| | Low adoption | Medium | High | Community building, documentation | | ||
| | Funding constraints | Low | High | Phase-based approach, can pause | | ||
|
|
||
| ## Dependencies & Blockers | ||
|
|
||
| ### External Dependencies | ||
| - ✅ Gradio 5.0+ (available) | ||
| - ✅ React Flow (MIT license) | ||
| - ⏳ Gradio custom components framework (beta) | ||
| - ⏳ Community feedback on priorities | ||
|
|
||
| ### Internal Blockers | ||
| - None currently identified | ||
| - Risk: Limited testing resources → Use community beta testing | ||
|
|
||
| ## Next Steps | ||
|
|
||
| 1. **Week 1:** Validate plan with stakeholders/community | ||
| 2. **Week 1-2:** Technical spikes: | ||
| - React Flow + Gradio integration | ||
| - SSE streaming with Gradio | ||
| - Session storage design | ||
| 3. **Week 2:** Create detailed technical specs for Phase 1 | ||
| 4. **Week 3:** Begin Phase 1 implementation | ||
|
|
||
| ## Document Index | ||
|
|
||
| Detailed planning documents: | ||
| - `01-PHASE1-REALTIME-UX.md` - Real-time streaming & UX improvements | ||
| - `02-PHASE2-VISUAL-WORKFLOW.md` - Workflow builder implementation | ||
| - `03-PHASE3-OBSERVABILITY.md` - Debugging & monitoring tools | ||
| - `04-PHASE4-ARCHITECTURE.md` - Event-driven & plugin system | ||
| - `05-TECHNICAL-SPECS.md` - Detailed technical specifications | ||
| - `06-UI-UX-DESIGNS.md` - UI mockups and user flows | ||
| - `07-IMPLEMENTATION-ROADMAP.md` - Sprint-by-sprint breakdown | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| **Last Updated:** 2025-10-21 | ||
| **Next Review:** Weekly during implementation | ||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This document reports the plan as still in the "Planning Phase", but the planning index already marks the effort as "Planning Complete", so the documentation now conflicts and will confuse readers.
Prompt for AI agents