A Python project focused on software quality analysis, requirement validation, and test effectiveness.
One of the most common problems in software development is assuming that passing tests automatically mean the implementation is correct.
In reality, test suites can be incomplete, poorly designed, or misaligned with the actual business requirements. As a result, incorrect implementations may pass all tests while still violating the intended behavior.
This repository contains practical examples that demonstrate the difference between:
- Passing tests
- Correct implementations
- Well-defined requirements
- Effective test coverage
The goal of this project is to analyze situations where:
- Requirements are partially or incorrectly validated.
- Tests pass despite implementation defects.
- Edge cases are missing from the test suite.
- Boundary conditions are not covered.
- Test coverage creates a false sense of correctness.
A user should be considered an adult only if they are 18 years old or older.
def is_adult(age: int) -> bool:
return age >= 16def test_adult_user_returns_true():
assert is_adult(20) is True
def test_child_user_returns_false():
assert is_adult(10) is FalseAll tests pass.
However, the implementation incorrectly classifies 16 and 17-year-old users as adults.
The test suite validates only obvious scenarios and fails to verify the actual business rule.
This demonstrates a common quality issue where passing tests do not guarantee that the underlying requirement has been satisfied.
test-oracle-lab/
│
├── src/
│ └── validators.py
│
├── tests/
│ ├── test_weak_tests.py
│ └── test_strong_tests.py
│
├── cases/
│ └── adult_validator_analysis.md
│
├── requirements.txt
└── README.md
- Requirement Analysis
- Test Validation
- Boundary Testing
- Edge Cases
- Software Quality
- Root Cause Analysis
- Test Design
- Technical Review
Install dependencies:
pip install -r requirements.txtRun the test suite:
pytestIn many software quality workflows, automated tests become the source of truth.
When tests are incomplete or misaligned with requirements, incorrect solutions can be accepted as valid. Identifying these situations requires technical judgment, critical thinking, and a deep understanding of how requirements, implementations, and tests interact.
This repository explores those scenarios through simple, reproducible Python examples.