-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.4k
[FlowSensitive] [StatusOr] [15/15] Support references to Status(Or)* #170951
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
fmayer
wants to merge
1
commit into
users/fmayer/spr/main.flowsensitive-statusor-1515-support-references-to-statusor
Choose a base branch
from
users/fmayer/spr/flowsensitive-statusor-1515-support-references-to-statusor
base: users/fmayer/spr/main.flowsensitive-statusor-1515-support-references-to-statusor
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+115
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Created using spr 1.3.7
Member
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Florian Mayer (fmayer) ChangesThat hopefully concludes the initial upstreaming. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170951.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Models/UncheckedStatusOrAccessModel.cpp b/clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Models/UncheckedStatusOrAccessModel.cpp
index c917c8e8c11ba..f8439d875d8c7 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Models/UncheckedStatusOrAccessModel.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Models/UncheckedStatusOrAccessModel.cpp
@@ -351,6 +351,25 @@ static auto isAssertionResultConstructFromBoolCall() {
hasArgument(0, hasType(booleanType())));
}
+static auto isStatusOrReturningCall() {
+ using namespace ::clang::ast_matchers; // NOLINT: Too many names
+ return callExpr(
+ callee(functionDecl(returns(possiblyReferencedStatusOrType()))));
+}
+
+static auto isStatusOrPtrReturningCall() {
+ using namespace ::clang::ast_matchers; // NOLINT: Too many names
+ return callExpr(callee(functionDecl(returns(hasUnqualifiedDesugaredType(
+ pointerType(pointee(possiblyReferencedStatusOrType())))))));
+}
+
+static auto isStatusPtrReturningCall() {
+ using namespace ::clang::ast_matchers; // NOLINT: Too many names
+ return callExpr(callee(functionDecl(returns(hasUnqualifiedDesugaredType(
+ pointerType(pointee(hasUnqualifiedDesugaredType(
+ recordType(hasDeclaration(statusClass()))))))))));
+}
+
static auto
buildDiagnoseMatchSwitch(const UncheckedStatusOrAccessModelOptions &Options) {
return CFGMatchSwitchBuilder<const Environment,
@@ -1057,6 +1076,40 @@ static void transferArrowCall(const CallExpr *Expr,
StatusOrLoc->getSyntheticField("value")));
}
+static void transferStatusOrPtrReturningCall(const CallExpr *Expr,
+ const MatchFinder::MatchResult &,
+ LatticeTransferState &State) {
+ PointerValue *PointerVal =
+ dyn_cast_or_null<PointerValue>(State.Env.getValue(*Expr));
+ if (!PointerVal) {
+ PointerVal = cast<PointerValue>(State.Env.createValue(Expr->getType()));
+ State.Env.setValue(*Expr, *PointerVal);
+ }
+
+ auto *RecordLoc =
+ dyn_cast_or_null<RecordStorageLocation>(&PointerVal->getPointeeLoc());
+ if (RecordLoc != nullptr &&
+ State.Env.getValue(locForOk(locForStatus(*RecordLoc))) == nullptr)
+ initializeStatusOr(*RecordLoc, State.Env);
+}
+
+static void transferStatusPtrReturningCall(const CallExpr *Expr,
+ const MatchFinder::MatchResult &,
+ LatticeTransferState &State) {
+ PointerValue *PointerVal =
+ dyn_cast_or_null<PointerValue>(State.Env.getValue(*Expr));
+ if (!PointerVal) {
+ PointerVal = cast<PointerValue>(State.Env.createValue(Expr->getType()));
+ State.Env.setValue(*Expr, *PointerVal);
+ }
+
+ auto *RecordLoc =
+ dyn_cast_or_null<RecordStorageLocation>(&PointerVal->getPointeeLoc());
+ if (RecordLoc != nullptr &&
+ State.Env.getValue(locForOk(*RecordLoc)) == nullptr)
+ initializeStatus(*RecordLoc, State.Env);
+}
+
static RecordStorageLocation *
getSmartPtrLikeStorageLocation(const Expr &E, const Environment &Env) {
if (!E.isPRValue())
@@ -1209,6 +1262,18 @@ buildTransferMatchSwitch(ASTContext &Ctx,
transferNonConstMemberCall)
.CaseOfCFGStmt<CXXOperatorCallExpr>(isNonConstMemberOperatorCall(),
transferNonConstMemberOperatorCall)
+ // N.B. this has to be after transferConstMemberCall, otherwise we would
+ // always return a fresh RecordStorageLocation for the StatusOr.
+ .CaseOfCFGStmt<CallExpr>(isStatusOrReturningCall(),
+ [](const CallExpr *Expr,
+ const MatchFinder::MatchResult &,
+ LatticeTransferState &State) {
+ transferStatusOrReturningCall(Expr, State);
+ })
+ .CaseOfCFGStmt<CallExpr>(isStatusOrPtrReturningCall(),
+ transferStatusOrPtrReturningCall)
+ .CaseOfCFGStmt<CallExpr>(isStatusPtrReturningCall(),
+ transferStatusPtrReturningCall)
// N.B. These need to come after all other CXXConstructExpr.
// These are there to make sure that every Status and StatusOr object
// have their ok boolean initialized when constructed. If we were to
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/UncheckedStatusOrAccessModelTestFixture.cpp b/clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/UncheckedStatusOrAccessModelTestFixture.cpp
index cd7353c62f537..c012d0527870b 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/UncheckedStatusOrAccessModelTestFixture.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/UncheckedStatusOrAccessModelTestFixture.cpp
@@ -3840,6 +3840,56 @@ TEST_P(UncheckedStatusOrAccessModelTest, NestedStatusOrInStatusOrStruct) {
)cc");
}
+TEST_P(UncheckedStatusOrAccessModelTest, StatusOrPtrReference) {
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"cc(
+#include "unchecked_statusor_access_test_defs.h"
+
+ const STATUSOR_INT* foo();
+
+ void target() {
+ const auto& sor = foo();
+ if (sor->ok()) sor->value();
+ }
+ )cc");
+
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"cc(
+#include "unchecked_statusor_access_test_defs.h"
+
+ using StatusOrPtr = const STATUSOR_INT*;
+ StatusOrPtr foo();
+
+ void target() {
+ const auto& sor = foo();
+ if (sor->ok()) sor->value();
+ }
+ )cc");
+}
+
+TEST_P(UncheckedStatusOrAccessModelTest, StatusPtrReference) {
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"cc(
+#include "unchecked_statusor_access_test_defs.h"
+
+ const STATUS* foo();
+
+ void target(STATUSOR_INT sor) {
+ const auto& s = foo();
+ if (s->ok() && *s == sor.status()) sor.value();
+ }
+ )cc");
+
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"cc(
+#include "unchecked_statusor_access_test_defs.h"
+
+ using StatusPtr = const STATUS*;
+ StatusPtr foo();
+
+ void target(STATUSOR_INT sor) {
+ const auto& s = foo();
+ if (s->ok() && *s == sor.status()) sor.value();
+ }
+ )cc");
+}
+
} // namespace
std::string
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
clang:analysis
clang:dataflow
Clang Dataflow Analysis framework - https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DataFlowAnalysisIntro.html
clang
Clang issues not falling into any other category
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
That hopefully concludes the initial upstreaming.